WebRoots.org
Nonprofit Library for Genealogy & History-Related Research
A Free Resource Covering the United States
and Some International Areas
Library - United States - Women in America
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: With Strictures on Political and
Moral Subjects, by Mary Wollstonecraft
Published: 2nd Edition, London, J. Johnson, 1792
Note: Author is mother of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelly, Frankenstein author
A VINDICATION
OF THE
RIGHTS OF WOMAN:
WITH STRICTURES ON
POLITICAL AND
MORAL SUBJECTS
By
MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT
London
J. Johnson
1792
CONTENTS:
DEDICATION
ADVERTISEMENT
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I. THE RIGHTS AND INVOLVED DUTIES OF MANKIND CONSIDERED
CHAPTER II. THE PREVAILING OPINION OF A SEXUAL CHARACTER DISCUSSED
CHAPTER III. THE SAME SUBJECT CONTINUED
CHAPTER IV. OBSERVATIONS ON THE STATE OF DEGRADATION TO WHICH WOMAN IS
REDUCED BY VARIOUS CAUSES
CHAPTER V. ANIMADVERSIONS ON SOME OF THE WRITERS WHO HAVE RENDERED WOMEN
OBJECTS OF PITY, BORDERING ON CONTEMPT
CHAPTER VI. THE EFFECT WHICH AN EARLY ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS HAS UPON THE
CHARACTER
CHAPTER VII. MODESTY. -- COMPREHENSIVELY CONSIDERED, AND NOT AS A SEXUAL
VIRTUE
CHAPTER VIII. MORALITY UNDERMINED BY SEXUAL NOTIONS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF A
GOOD REPUTATION
CHAPTER IX. OF THE PERNICIOUS EFFECTS WHICH ARISE FROM THE UNNATURAL
DISTINCTIONS ESTABLISHED IN SOCIETY
CHAPTER X. PARENTAL AFFECTION
CHAPTER XI. DUTY TO PARENTS
CHAPTER XII. ON NATIONAL EDUCATION
CHAPTER XIII. SOME INSTANCES OF THE FOLLY WHICH THE IGNORANCE OF WOMEN
GENERATES; WITH CONCLUDING REFLECTIONS ON THE MORAL IMPROVEMENT THAT A
REVOLUTION IN FEMALE MANNERS MAY NATURALLY BE EXPECTED TO PRODUCE
DEDICATION
To
M. Talleyrand-Perigord,
Late Bishop of Autun.
SIR,
HAVING read with great pleasure a pamphlet, which you have lately
published, on National Education, I dedicate this volume to you -- the
first dedication that I have ever written, to induce you to read it with
attention; and, because I think that you will understand me, which I do
not suppose many pert witlings will, who may ridicule the arguments they
are unable to answer. But, Sir, I carry my respect for your understanding
still farther; so far, that I am confident you will not throw my work
aside, and hastily conclude that I am in the wrong, because you did not
view the subject in the same light yourself. And, pardon my frankness, but
I must observe, that you treated it in too cursory a manner, contented to
consider it as it had been considered formerly, when the rights of man,
not to advert to woman, were trampled on as chimerical -- I call upon you,
therefore, now to weigh what I have advanced respecting the rights of
woman, and national education -- and I call with the firm tone of
humanity. For my arguments, Sir, are dictated by a disinterested spirit --
I plead for my sex -- not for myself. Independence I have long considered
as the grand blessing of life, the basis of every virtue -- and
independence I will ever secure by contracting my wants, though I were to
live on a barren heath.
It is then an affection for the whole human race that makes my pen dart
rapidly along to support what I believe to be the cause of virtue: and the
same motive leads me earnestly to wish to see woman placed in a station in
which she would advance, instead of retarding, the progress of those
glorious principles that give a substance to morality. My opinion, indeed,
respecting the rights and duties of woman, seems to flow so naturally from
these simple principles, that I think it scarcely possible, but that some
of the enlarged minds who formed your admirable constitution, will
coincide with me.
In France there is undoubtedly a more general diffusion of knowledge than
in any part of the European world, and I attribute it, in a great measure,
to the social intercourse which has long subsisted between the sexes. It
is true, I utter my sentiments with freedom, that in France the very
essence of sensuality has been extracted to regale the voluptuary, and a
kind of sentimental lust has prevailed, which, together with the system of
duplicity that the whole tenor of their political and civil government
taught, have given a sinister sort of sagacity to the French character,
properly termed finesse, and a polish of manners that injures the
substance, by hunting sincerity out of society. -- And, modesty, the
fairest garb of virtue! has been more grossly insulted in France than even
in England, till their women have treated as prudish that attention to
decency, which brutes instinctively observe.
Manners and morals are so nearly allied that they have often been
confounded; but, though the former should only be the natural reflection
of the latter, yet, when various causes have produced factitious and
corrupt manners, which are very early caught, morality becomes an empty
name. The personal reserve, and sacred respect for cleanliness and
delicacy in domestic life, which French women almost despise, are the
graceful pillars of modesty; but, far from despising them, if the pure
flame of patriotism have reached their bosoms, they should labour to
improve the morals of their fellow-citizens, by teaching men, not only to
respect modesty in women, but to acquire it themselves, as the only way to
merit their esteem.
Contending for the rights of woman, my main argument is built on this
simple principle, that if she be not prepared by education to become the
companion of man, she will stop the progress of knowledge, for truth must
be common to all, or it will be inefficacious with respect to its
influence on general practice. And how can woman be expected to co-operate
unless she knows why she ought to be virtuous? unless freedom strengthens
her reason till she comprehend her duty, and see in what manner it is
connected with her real good? If children are to be educated to understand
the true principle of patriotism, their mother must be a patriot; and the
love of mankind, from which an orderly train of virtues spring, can only
be produced by considering the moral and civil interest of mankind; but
the education and situation of woman, at present, shuts her out from such
investigations.
In this work I have produced many arguments, which to me were conclusive,
to prove that the prevailing notion respecting a sexual character was
subversive of morality, and I have contended, that to render the human
body and mind more perfect, chastity must more universally prevail, and
that chastity will never be respected in the male world till the person of
a woman is not, as it were, idolized, when little virtue or sense
embellish it with the grand traces of mental beauty, or the interesting
simplicity of affection.
Consider, Sir, dispassionately, these observations -- for a glimpse of
this truth seemed to open before you when you observed, 'that to see one
half of the human race excluded by the other from all participation of
government, was a political ph?nomenon that, according to abstract
principles, it was impossible to explain.' If so, on what does your
constitution rest? If the abstract rights of man will bear discussion and
explanation, those of woman, by a parity of reasoning, will not shrink
from the same test: though a different opinion prevails in this country,
built on the very arguments which you use to justify the oppression of
woman -- prescription.
Consider, I address you as a legislator, whether, when men contend for
their freedom, and to be allowed to judge for themselves respecting their
own happiness, it be not inconsistent and unjust to subjugate women, even
though you firmly believe that you are acting in the manner best
calculated to promote their happiness? Who made man the exclusive judge,
if woman partake with him of the gift of reason?
In this style, argue tyrants of every denomination, from the weak king to
the weak father of a family; they are all eager to crush reason; yet
always assert that they usurp its throne only to be useful. Do you not act
a similar part, when you force all women, by denying them civil and
political rights, to remain immured in their families groping in the dark?
for surely, Sir, you will not assert, that a duty can be binding which is
not founded on reason? If indeed this be their destination, arguments may
be drawn from reason: and thus augustly supported, the more understanding
women acquire, the more they will be attached to their duty --
comprehending it -- for unless they comprehend it, unless their morals be
fixed on the same immutable principle as those of man, no authority can
make them discharge it in a virtuous manner. They may be convenient
slaves, but slavery will have its constant effect, degrading the master
and the abject dependent.
But, if women are to be excluded, without having a voice, from a
participation of the natural rights of mankind, prove first, to ward off
the charge of injustice and inconsistency, that they want reason, -- else
this flaw in your NEW CONSTITUTION, the first constitution founded on
reason, will ever shew that man must, in some shape, act like a tyrant,
and tyranny, in whatever part of society it rears its brazen front, will
ever undermine morality.
I have repeatedly asserted, and produced what appeared to me irrefragable
arguments drawn from matters of fact, to prove my assertion, that women
cannot, by force, be confined to domestic concerns; for they will, however
ignorant, intermeddle with more weighty affairs, neglecting private duties
only to disturb, by cunning tricks, the orderly plans of reason which rise
above their comprehension.
Besides, whilst they are only made to acquire personal accomplishments,
men will seek for pleasure in variety, and faithless husbands will make
faithless wives; such ignorant beings, indeed, will be very excusable
when, not taught to respect public good, nor allowed any civil rights,
they attempt to do themselves justice by retaliation.
The box of mischief thus opened in society, what is to preserve private
virtue, the only security of public freedom and universal happiness?
Let there be then no coercion established in society, and the common law
of gravity prevailing, the sexes will fall into their proper places. And,
now that more equitable laws are forming your citizens, marriage may
become more sacred: your young men may choose wives from motives of
affection, and your maidens allow love to root out vanity.
The father of a family will not then weaken his constitution and debase
his sentiments, by visiting the harlot, nor forget, in obeying the call of
appetite, the purpose for which it was implanted. And, the mother will not
neglect her children to practise the arts of coquetry, when sense and
modesty secure her the friendship of her husband.
But, till men become attentive to the duty of a father, it is vain to
expect women to spend that time in their nursery which they, 'wise in
their generation,' choose to spend at their glass; for this exertion of
cunning is only an instinct of nature to enable them to obtain indirectly
a little of that power of which they are unjustly denied a share: for, if
women are not permitted to enjoy legitimate rights, they will render both
men and themselves vicious, to obtain illicit privileges.
I wish, Sir, to set some investigations of this kind afloat in France; and
should they lead to a confirmation of my principles, when your
constitution is revised the Rights of Woman may be respected, if it be
fully proved that reason calls for this respect, and loudly demands
JUSTICE for one half of the human race.
I am, SIR,
Yours respectfully,
M. W.
ADVERTISEMENT
WHEN I began to write this work, I divided it into three parts, supposing
that one volume would contain a full discussion of the arguments which
seemed to me to rise naturally from a few simple principles; but fresh
illustrations occurring as I advanced, I now present only the first part
to the public.
Many subjects, however, which I have cursorily alluded to, call for
particular investigation, especially the laws relative to women, and the
consideration of their peculiar duties. These will furnish ample matter
for a second volume, which in due time will be published, to elucidate
some of the sentiments, and complete many of the sketches begun in the
first.
INTRODUCTION
AFTER considering the historic page, and viewing the living world with
anxious solicitude, the most melancholy emotions of sorrowful indignation
have depressed my spirits, and I have sighed when obliged to confess, that
either nature has made a great difference between man and man, or that the
civilization which has hitherto taken place in the world has been very
partial. I have turned over various books written on the subject of
education, and patiently observed the conduct of parents and the
management of schools; but what has been the result? -- a profound
conviction that the neglected education of my fellow-creatures is the
grand source of the misery I deplore; and that women, in particular, are
rendered weak and wretched by a variety of concurring causes, originating
from one hasty conclusion. The conduct and manners of women, in fact,
evidently prove that their minds are not in a healthy state; for, like the
flowers which are planted in too rich a soil, strength and usefulness are
sacrificed to beauty; and the flaunting leaves, after having pleased a
fastidious eye, fade, disregarded on the stalk, long before the season
when they ought to have arrived at maturity. -- One cause of this barren
blooming I attribute to a false system of education, gathered from the
books written on this subject by men who, considering females rather as
women than human creatures, have been more anxious to make them alluring
mistresses than wives; and the understanding of the sex has been so
bubbled by this specious homage, that the civilized women of the present
century, with a few exceptions, are only anxious to inspire love, when
they ought to cherish a nobler ambition, and by their abilities and
virtues exact respect.
In a treatise, therefore, on female rights and manners, the works which
have been particularly written for their improvement must not be
overlooked; especially when it is asserted, in direct terms, that the
minds of women are enfeebled by false refinement; that the books of
instruction, written by men of genius, have had the same tendency as more
frivolous productions; and that, in the true style of Mahometanism, they
are only considered as females, and not as a part of the human species,
when improvable reason is allowed to be the dignified distinction which
raises men above the brute creation, and puts a natural sceptre in a
feeble hand.
Yet, because I am a woman, I would not lead my readers to suppose that I
mean violently to agitate the contested question respecting the equality
or inferiority of the sex; but as the subject lies in my way, and I cannot
pass it over without subjecting the main tendency of my reasoning to
misconstruction, I shall stop a moment to deliver, in a few words, my
opinion. -- In the government of the physical world it is observable that
the female, in general, inferior to the male. The male pursues, the female
yields -- this is the law of nature; and it does not appear to be
suspended or abrogated in favour of woman. This physical superiority
cannot be denied -- and it is a noble prerogative! But not content with
this natural pre-eminence, men endeavour to sink us still lower, merely to
render us alluring objects for a moment; and women, intoxicated by the
adoration which men, under the influence of their senses, pay them, do not
seek to obtain a durable interest in their hearts, or to become the
friends of the fellow creatures who find amusement in their society.
I am aware of an obvious inference: -- from every quarter have I heard
exclamations against masculine women; but where are they to be found? If
by this appellation men mean to inveigh against their ardour in hunting,
shooting, and gaming, I shall most cordially join in the cry; but if it be
against the imitation of manly virtues, or, more properly speaking, the
attainment of those talents and virtues, the exercise of which ennobles
the human character, and which raises females in the scale of animal
being, when they are comprehensively termed mankind; -- all those who view
them with a philosophical eye must, I should think, wish with me, that
they may every day grow more and more masculine.
This discussion naturally divides the subject. I shall first consider
women in the grand light of human creatures, who, in common with men, are
placed on this earth to unfold their faculties; and afterwards I shall
more particularly point out their peculiar designation.
I wish also to steer clear of an error which many respectable writers have
fallen into; for the instruction which has hither been addressed to women,
has rather been applicable to ladies, if the little indirect advice, that
is scattered through Sanford and Merton be excepted; but, addressing my
sex in a firmer tone, I pay particular attention to those in the middle
class, because they appear to be in the most natural state. Perhaps the
seeds of false refinement, immorality, and vanity, have ever been shed by
the great. Weak, artificial beings, raised above the common wants and
affections of their race, in a premature unnatural manner, undermine the
very foundation of virtue, and spread corruption through the whole mass of
society! As a class of mankind they have the strongest claim to pity; the
education of the rich tends to render them vain and helpless, and the
unfolding mind is not strengthened by the practice of those duties which
dignify the human character. -- They only live to amuse themselves, and by
the same law which in nature invariably produces certain effects, they
soon only afford barren amusement.
But as I purpose taking a separate view of the different ranks of society,
and of the moral character of women, in each, this hint is, for the
present, sufficient; and I have only alluded to the subject, because it
appears to me to be the very essence of an introduction to give a cursory
account of the contents of the work it introduces.
My own sex, I hope, will excuse me, if I treat them like rational
creatures, instead of flattering their fascinating graces, and viewing
them as if they were in a state of perpetual childhood, unable to stand
alone. I earnestly wish to point out in what true dignity and human
happiness consists -- I wish to persuade women to endeavour to acquire
strength, both of mind and body, and to convince them that the soft
phrases, susceptibility of heart, delicacy of sentiment, and refinement of
taste, are almost synonimous with epithets of weakness, and that those
beings who are only the objects of pity and that kind of love, which has
been termed its sister, will soon become objects of contempt.
Dismissing then those pretty feminine phrases, which the men
condescendingly use to soften our slavish dependence, and despising that
weak elegancy of mind, exquisite sensibility, and sweet docility of
manners, supposed to be the sexual characteristics of the weaker vessel, I
wish to show that elegance is inferior to virtue, that the first object of
laudable ambition is to obtain a character as a human being, regardless of
the distinction of sex; and that secondary views should be brought to this
simple touchstone.
This is a rough sketch of my plan; and should I express my conviction with
the energetic emotions that I feel whenever I think of the subject, the
dictates of experience and reflection will be felt by some of my readers.
Animated by this important object, I shall disdain to cull my phrases or
polish my style; -- I aim at being useful, and sincerity will render me
unaffected; for, wishing rather to persuade by the force of my arguments,
than dazzle by the elegance of my language, I shall not waste my time in
rounding periods, nor in fabricating the turgid bombast of artificial
feelings, which, coming from the head, never reach the heart. -- I shall
be employed about things, not words! -- and, anxious to render my sex more
respectable members of society, I shall try to avoid that flowery diction
which has slided from essays into novels, and from novels into familiar
letters and conversation.
These pretty nothings -- these caricatures of the real beauty of
sensibility, dropping glibly from the tongue, vitiate the taste, and
create a kind of sickly delicacy that turns away from simple unadorned
truth; and a deluge of false sentiments and overstretched feelings,
stifling the natural emotions of the heart, render the domestic pleasures
insipid, that ought to sweeten the exercise of those severe duties, which
educate a rational and immortal being for a nobler field of action.
The education of women has, of late, been more attended to than formerly;
yet they are still reckoned a frivolous sex, and ridiculed or pitied by
the writers who endeavor by satire or instruction to improve them. It is
acknowledged that they spend many of the first years of their lives in
acquiring a smattering of accomplishments: meanwhile strength of body and
mind are sacrificed to libertine notions of beauty, to the desire of
establishing themselves, -- the only way women can rise in the world, --
by marriage. And this desire making mere animals of them, when they marry
they act as such children may be expected to act: -- they dress; they
paint, and nickname God's creatures. -- Surely these weak beings are only
fit for a seraglio! -- Can they govern a family, or take care of the poor
babes whom they bring into the world?
If then it can be fairly deduced from the present conduct of the sex, from
the prevalent fondness for pleasure which takes place of ambition and
those nobler passions that open and enlarge the soul; that the instruction
which women have received has only tended, with the constitution of civil
society, to render them insignificant objects of desire -- mere
propagators of fools! -- if it can be proved that in aiming to accomplish
them, without cultivating their understandings, they are taken out of
their sphere of duties, and made ridiculous and useless when the short-
lived bloom of beauty is over,(1) I presume that rational men will excuse
me for endeavouring to persuade them to become more masculine and
respectable.
Indeed the word masculine is only a bugbear: there is little reason to
fear that women will acquire too much courage or fortitude; for their
apparent inferiority with respect to bodily strength, must render them, in
some degree, dependent on men in the various relations of life; but why
should it be increased by prejudices that give a sex to virtue, and
confound simple truths with sensual reveries?
Women are, in fact, so much degraded by mistaken notions of female
excellence, that I do not mean to add a paradox when I assert, that this
artificial weakness produces a propensity to tyrannize, and gives birth to
cunning, the natural opponent of strength, which leads them to play off
those contemptible infantile airs that undermine esteem even whilst they
excite desire. Do not foster these prejudices, and they will naturally
fall into their subordinate, yet respectable station, in life.
It seems scarcely necessary to say, that I now speak of the sex in
general. Many individuals have more sense than their male relatives; and,
as nothing preponderates where there is a constant struggle for an
equilibrium, without it has naturally more gravity, some women govern
their husbands without degrading themselves, because intellect will always
govern.
(1. A lively writer, I cannot recollect his name, asks what business women
turned of forty have to do in the world?)
Vindication of the Rights of Woman - End of Introduction
Search All Library Items
How to Donate Books & Money
WebRoots Home Page ~
Library Main Page ~
Catalog Main Page
List of Newest & All Library Items ~
Contact WebRoots
Contents of this Website (c) WebRoots, Inc.
A Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation