WebRoots.org
Nonprofit Library for Genealogy & History-Related Research
A Free Resource Covering the United States
and Some International Areas
Library - United States - Native America
The Red Man's Continent - Chapters V-Bibliographical Note
CHAPTER V.
THE RED MAN IN AMERICA
When the white man first explored America, the parts of the continent that
had made most progress were by no means those that are most advanced
today.(*) None of the inhabitants, to be sure, had risen above barbarism.
Yet certain nations or tribes had advanced much higher than others. There
was a great contrast, for example, between the well-organized barbarians
of Peru and the almost completely unorganized Athapascan savages near
Hudson Bay.
(* In the present chapter most of the facts as to the Indians north of
Mexico are taken from the admirable "Handbook of American Indians North of
Mexico," edited by F. W. Hodge, Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of
Ethnology, Bulletin 30, Washington, 1907, two volumes. In summing up the
character and achievements of the Indians I have drawn also on other
sources, but have everywhere taken pains to make no statements which are
not abundantly supported by this authoritative publication. In some cases
I have not hesitated to paraphrase considerable portions of its articles.)
In the northern continent aboriginal America reached its highest
development in three typical environments. The first of these regions
centered in the valley of Mexico where dwelt the Aztecs, but it extended
as far north as the Pueblos in Arizona and New Mexico. The special feature
of the environment was the relatively dry, warm climate with the chief
rainfall in summer. The Indians living in this environment were notable
for their comparatively high social organization and for religious
ceremonials whose elaborateness has rarely been surpassed. On the whole,
the people of this summer rain or Mexican type were not warlike and
offered little resistance to European conquest. Some tribes, to be sure,
fought fiercely at first, but yielded within a few years; the rest
submitted to the lordly Spaniards almost without a murmur. Their
civilization, if such we may call it, had long ago seen its best days. The
period of energy and progress had passed, and a time of inertia and decay
had set in. A century after the Spaniards had overcome the aborigines of
Mexico, other Europeans--French, English, and Dutch--came into contact
with a sturdier type of red man, best represented by the Iroquois or Five
Nations of central New York. This more active type dwelt in a physical
environment notable for two features--the abundance of cyclonic storms
bringing rain or snow at all seasons and the deciduous forest which
thickly covered the whole region. Unlike the Mexican, the civilization of
the Iroquois was young, vigorous, and growing. It had not learned to
express itself in durable architectural forms like those of Mexico, nor
could it rival the older type in social and religious organization. In
political organization, however, the Five Nations had surpassed the other
aboriginal peoples of North America. When the white man became acquainted
with the Iroquois in the seventeenth century, he found five of their
tribes organized into a remarkable confederation whose avowed object was
to abolish war among themselves and to secure to all the members the
peaceful exercise of their rights and privileges. So well was the
confederation organized that, in spite of war with its enemies, it
persisted for at least two hundred years. One of the chief characteristics
of the Iroquois was their tremendous energy. They were so energetic that
they pursued their enemies with an implacable relentlessness similar to
the restless eagerness with which the people of the region from New York
to Chicago now pursue their business enterprises. This led the Iroquois to
torture their prisoners with the utmost ingenuity and cruelty. Not only
did the savages burn and mutilate their captives, but they sometimes added
the last refinement of torture by compelling the suffering wretches to eat
pieces of flesh cut from their own bodies. Energy may lead to high
civilization, but it may also lead to excesses of evil. The third
prominent aboriginal type was that of the fishermen of the coast of
British Columbia, especially the Haidas of the Queen Charlotte Islands.
The most important features of their environment were the submerged coast
with its easy navigation, the mild oceanic climate, and the dense pine
forests. The Haidas, like the Iroquois, appear to have been a people who
were still advancing. Such as it was, their greatness was apparently the
product of their own ingenuity and not, like that of the Mexicans, an
inheritance from a greater past. The Haidas lacked the relentless energy
of the Iroquois and shared the comparatively gentle character which
prevailed among all the Indians along the Pacific Coast. They were by no
means weaklings, however. Commercially, for instance, they seem to have
been more advanced than any North American tribe except those in the
Mexican area. In architecture they stood equally high. We are prone to
think of the Mexicans as the best architects among the aborigines, but
when the white man came even the Aztecs were merely imitating the work of
their predecessors. The Haidas, on the contrary, were showing real
originality. They had no stone with which to build, for their country is
so densely forested that stone is rarely visible. They were remarkably
skillful, however, in hewing great beams from the forest. With these they
constructed houses whose carved totem poles and graceful facades gave
promise of an architecture of great beauty. Taking into account the
difficulties presented by a material which was not durable and by tools
which were nothing but bits of stone, we must regard their totem poles and
mural decorations as real contributions to primitive architecture.
In addition to these three highest types of the red man there were many
others. Each, as we shall see, owed its peculiarities largely to the
physical surroundings in which it lived. Of course different tribes
possessed different degrees of innate ability, but the chief differences
in their habits and mode of life arose from the topography, the climate,
the plants, and the animals which formed the geographical setting of their
homes.
In previous chapters we have gained some idea of the topography of the New
World and of the climate in its relation to plants and animals. We have
also seen that climate has much to do with human energy. We have not,
however, gained a sufficiently clear idea of the distribution of climatic
energy. A map of the world showing how energy would be distributed if it
depended entirely upon climate clarifies the subject. The dark shading of
the map indicates those regions where energy is highest. It is based upon
measurements of the strength of scores of individuals, upon the scholastic
records of hundreds of college students, upon the piecework of thousands
of factory operatives, and upon millions of deaths and births in a score
of different countries. It takes account of three chief climatic
conditions--temperature, humidity, and variability. It also takes account
of mental as well as physical ability. Underneath it is a map of the
distribution of civilization on the basis of the opinion of fifty
authorities in fifteen different countries. The similarity of the two maps
is so striking that there can be little question that today the
distribution of civilization agrees closely with the distribution of
climatic energy. When Egypt, Babylonia, Greece, and Rome were at the
height of their power this agreement was presumably the same, for the
storm belt which now gives variability and hence energy to the thickly
shaded regions in our two maps then apparently lay farther south. It is
generally considered that no race has been more closely dependent upon
physical environment than were the Indians. Why, then, did the energizing
effect of climate apparently have less effect upon them than upon the
other great races? Why were not the most advanced Indian tribes found in
the same places where white civilization is today most advanced? Climatic
changes might in part account for the difference, but, although such
changes apparently took place on a large scale in earlier times, there is
no evidence of anything except minor fluctuations since the days of the
first white settlements. Racial inheritance likewise may account for some
of the differences among the various tribes, but it was probably not the
chief factor. That factor was apparently the condition of agriculture
among people who had neither iron tools nor beasts of burden. Civilization
has never made much progress except when there has been a permanent
cultivation of the ground. It has been said that "the history of
agriculture is the history of man in his most primitive and most permanent
aspect." If we examine the achievements and manner of life of the Indians
in relation to the effect of climate upon agriculture and human energy, as
well as in relation to the more obvious features of topography and
vegetation, we shall understand why the people of aboriginal America in
one part of the continent differed so greatly from those in another part.
In the far north the state of the inhabitants today is scarcely different
from what it was in the days of Columbus. Then, as now, the Eskimos had
practically no political or social organization beyond the family or the
little group of relatives who lived in a single camp. They had no
permanent villages, but moved from place to place according to the season
in search of fish, game, and birds. They lived this simple life not
because they lacked ability but because of their surroundings. Their
kayaks or canoes are marvels of ingenuity. With no materials except bones,
driftwood, and skins they made boats which fulfilled their purpose with
extraordinary perfection. Seated in the small, round hole which is the
only opening in the deck of his canoe, the Eskimo hunter ties his skin
jacket tightly outside the circular gunwale and is thus shut into a
practically water-tight compartment. Though the waves dash over him,
scarcely a drop enters the craft as he skims along with his double paddle
among cakes of floating ice. So, too, the snowhouse with its anterooms and
curved entrance passage is as clever an adaptation to the needs of
wanderers in a land of ice and snow as is the skyscraper to the needs of a
busy commercial people crowded into great cities. The fact that the
oilburning, soapstone lamps of the Eskimo were the only means of producing
artificial light in aboriginal America, except by ordinary fires, is
another tribute to the ingenuity of these northerners. So, too, is the
fire-drill by which they alone devised a means of increasing the speed
with which one stick could be twirled against another to produce fire. In
view of these clever inventions it seems safe to say that the Eskimo has
remained a nomadic savage not because he lacks inventive skill but partly
because the climate deadens his energies and still more because it forbids
him to practice agriculture.
Southward and inland from the coastal homes of the Eskimo lies the great
region of the northern pine forests. It extends from the interior of
Alaska southeastward in such a way as to include most of the Canadian
Rockies, the northern plains from Great Bear Lake almost to Lake Winnipeg,
and most of the great Laurentian shield around Hudson Bay and in the
peninsula of Labrador. Except among the inhabitants of the narrow Pacific
slope and those of the shores of Labrador and the St. Lawrence Valley, a
single type of barbarism prevailed among the Indians of all the vast pine
forest area. Only in a small section of the wheat-raising plains of
Alberta and Saskatchewan have their habits greatly changed because of the
arrival of the white man. Now as always the Indians in these northern
regions are held back by the long, benumbing winters. They cannot practice
agriculture, for no crops will grow. They cannot depend to any great
extent upon natural vegetation, for aside from blueberries, a few lichens,
and one or two other equally insignificant products, the forests furnish
no food except animals. These lowly people seem to have been so occupied
with the severe struggle with the elements that they could not even
advance out of savagery into barbarism. They were homeless nomads whose
movements were determined largely by the food supply.
Among the Athapascans who occupied all the western part of the northern
pine forests, clothing was made of deerskins with the hair left on. The
lodges were likewise of deer or caribou skins, although farther south
these were sometimes replaced by bark. The food of these tribes consisted
of caribou, deer, moose, and musk-ox together with smaller animals such as
the beaver and hare. They also ate various kinds of birds and the fish
found in the numerous lakes and rivers. They killed deer by driving them
into an angle formed by two converging rows of stakes, where they were
shot by hunters lying in wait. Among the Kawchodinne tribe near Great Bear
Lake hares were the chief source of both food and clothing. When an
unusually severe winter or some other disaster diminished the supply, the
Indians believed that the animals had mounted to the sky by means of the
trees and would return by the same way. In 1841 owing to scarcity of hares
many of this tribe died of starvation, and numerous acts of cannibalism
are said to have occurred. Small wonder that civilization was low and that
infanticide, especially of female children, was common. Among such people
women were naturally treated with a minimum of respect. Since they were
not skilled as hunters, there was relatively little which they could
contribute toward the sustenance of the family. Hence they were held in
low esteem, for among most primitive people woman is valued largely in
proportion to her economic contribution. Her low position is illustrated
by the peculiar funeral custom of the Takulli, an Athapascan tribe on the
Upper Frazer River. A widow was obliged to remain upon the funeral pyre of
her husband till the flames reached her own body. When the fire had died
down she collected the ashes of her dead and placed them in a basket,
which she was obliged to carry with her during three years of servitude in
the family of her husband. At the end of that time a feast was held, when
she was released from thraldom and permitted to remarry if she desired.
Poor and degraded as the people of the northern forests may have been,
they had their good traits. The Kutchins of the Yukon and Lower Mackenzie
regions, though they killed their female children, were exceedingly
hospitable and kept guests for months. Each head of a family took his turn
in feasting the whole band. On such occasions etiquette required the host
to fast until the guests had departed. At such feasts an interesting
wrestling game was played. First the smallest boys began to wrestle. The
victors wrestled with those next in strength and so on until finally the
strongest and freshest man in the band remained the final victor. Then the
girls and women went through the same progressive contest. It is hard to
determine whether the people of the northern pine forest were more or less
competent than their Eskimo neighbors. It perhaps makes little difference,
for it is doubtful whether even a race with brilliant natural endowments
could rise far in the scale of civilization under conditions so highly
adverse.
The Eskimos of the northern coasts and the people of the pine forests were
not the only aborigines whose development was greatly retarded because
they could not practice agriculture. All the people of the Pacific coast
from Alaska to Lower California were in similar circumstances.
Nevertheless those living along the northern part of this coast rose to a
much higher level than did those of California. This has sometimes been
supposed to show that geographical environment has little influence upon
civilization, but in reality it proves exactly the opposite.
The coast of British Columbia was one of the three chief centers of
aboriginal America. As The Encyclopaedia Britannica(*) puts it: "The Haida
people constituted with little doubt the finest race and that most
advanced in the arts of the entire west coast of North America." They and
their almost equally advanced Tlingit and Tsimshian neighbors on the
mainland displayed much mechanical skill, especially in canoe-building,
woodcarving, and the working of stone and copper, as well as in making
blankets and baskets. To this day they earn a considerable amount of money
by selling their carved objects of wood and slate to traders and tourists.
Their canoes were hollowed out of logs of cedar and were often very large.
Houses which were sometimes 40 by 100 feet were built of huge cedar beams
and planks, which were first worked with stone and were then put together
at great feasts. These correspond to the "raising bees" at which the
neighbors gathered to erect the frames of houses in early New England.
Each Haida house ordinarily had a single carved totem pole in the middle
of the gable end which faced toward the beach. Often the end posts in
front were also carved and the whole house was painted. Another evidence
of the fairly advanced state of the Haidas was their active commercial
intercourse with regions hundreds of miles away. At their "potlatches," as
the raising bees were called by the whites, trading went on vigorously.
Carved copper plates were among the articles which they esteemed of
highest value. Standing in the tribe depended on the possession of
property rather than on ability in war, in which respect the Haidas were
more like the people of today than were any of the other Indian tribes.
(* 11th Edition, vol. XXII, p. 730)
Slavery was common among the Haidas. Even as late as 1861, 7800 Tlingits
held 828 slaves. Slavery may not be a good institution in itself, but it
indicates that people are well-to-do, that they dwell in permanent abodes,
and that they have a well-established social order. Among the more
backward Iroquois, captives rarely became genuine slaves, for the social
and economic organization was not sufficiently developed to admit of this.
The few captives who were retained after a fight were adopted into the
tribe of the captors or else were allowed to live with them and shift for
themselves--a practice very different from that of the Haidas.
Another feature of the Haidas' life which showed comparative progress was
the social distinctions which existed among them. One of the ways in which
individuals maintained their social position was by giving away quantities
of goods of all kinds at the potlatches which they organized. A man
sometimes went so far as to strip himself of nearly every possession
except his house. In return for this, however, he obtained what seemed to
him an abundant reward in the respect with which his fellow-tribesmen
afterward regarded him. At subsequent potlatches he received in his turn a
measure of their goods in proportion to his own gifts, so that he was
sometimes richer than before. These potlatches were social as well as
industrial functions, and dancing and singing were interspersed with the
feasting. One of the amusements was a musical contest in which singers
from one tribe or band would contend with one another as to which could
remember the greatest number of songs or accurately repeat a new song
after hearing it for the first time. At the potlatches the children of
chiefs were initiated into secret societies. They had their noses, ears,
and lips pierced for ornaments, and some of them were tattooed. This great
respect for social position which the Haidas manifested is doubtless far
from ideal, but it at least indicates that a part of the tribe was
sufficiently advanced to accumulate property and to pass it on to its
descendants--a custom that is almost impossible among tribes which move
from place to place. The question suggests itself why these coast
barbarians were so much in advance of their neighbors a few hundred miles
away in the pine woods of the mountains. The climate was probably one
reason for this superiority. Instead of being in a region like the center
of the pine forests of British Columbia where human energy is sapped by
six or eight months of winter, the Haidas enjoyed conditions like those of
Scotland. Although snow fell occasionally, severe cold was unknown. Nor
was there great heat in summer. The Haidas dwelt where both bodily
strength and mental activity were stimulated. In addition to this
advantage of a favorable climate these Indians had a large and steady
supply of food close at hand. Most of their sustenance was obtained from
the sea and from the rivers, in which the runs of salmon furnished
abundant provisions, which rarely failed. In Hecate Strait, between the
Queen Charlotte Islands and the mainland, there were wonderfully
productive halibut fisheries, from which a supply of fish was dried and
packed away for the winter, so that there was always a store of provisions
on hand. The forests in their turn furnished berries and seeds, as well as
bears, mountain goats, and other game.
Moreover the people of the northwest coast had the advantage of not being
forced to move from place to place in order to follow the fish. They lived
on a drowned shore where bays, straits, and sounds are extraordinarily
numerous. The great waves of the Pacific are shut out by the islands so
that the waterways are almost always safe for canoes. Instead of moving
their dwellings in order to follow the food supply, as the Eskimo and the
people of the pine forest were forced to do, the Haidas and their
neighbors were able without difficulty to bring their food home. At all
seasons the canoes made it easy to transport large supplies of fish from
places even a hundred miles away. Having settled dwellings, the Haidas
could accumulate property and acquire that feeling of permanence which is
one of the most important conditions for the development of civilization.
Doubtless the Haidas were intellectually superior to many other tribes,
but even if they had not been greatly superior, their surroundings would
probably have made them stand relatively high in the scale of
civilization. Southward from the Haidas, around Puget Sound and in
Washington and Oregon, there was a gradual decline in civilization. The
Chinook Indians of the lower Columbia, beyond the limits of the great
northern archipelago, had large communal houses occupied by three or four
families of twenty or more individuals. Their villages were thus fairly
permanent, although there was much moving about in summer owing to the
nature of the food supply, which consisted chiefly of salmon, with roots
and berries indigenous to the region. The people were noted as traders not
only among themselves but with surrounding tribes. They were extremely
skillful in handling their canoes, which were well made, hollowed out of
single logs, and often of great size. In disposition they are described as
treacherous and deceitful, especially when their cupidity was aroused.
Slaves were common and were usually obtained by barter from surrounding
tribes, though occasionally by successful raids. These Indians of Oregon
by no means rivaled the Haidas, for their food supply was less certain and
they did not have the advantage of easy water communication, which did so
much to raise the Haidas to a high level of development.
Of the tribes farther south an observer says: "In general rudeness of
culture the California Indians are scarcely above the Eskimo, and whereas
the lack of development of the Eskimo on many sides of their nature is
reasonably attributable in part to their difficult and limiting
environment, the Indians of California inhabit a country naturally as
favorable, it would seem, as it might be. If the degree of civilization
attained by a people depends in any large measure on their habitat, as
does not seem likely, it might be concluded from the case of the
California Indians that natural advantages were an impediment rather than
an incentive to progress." In some of the tribes, such as the Hupa, for
example, there existed no organization and no formalities in the
government of the village. Formal councils were unknown, although the
chief might and often did ask advice of his men in a collected body. In
general the social structure of the California Indians was so simple and
loose that it is hardly correct to speak of their tribes. Whatever
solidarity there was among these people was due in part to family ties and
in part to the fact that they lived in the same village and spoke the same
dialect. Between different groups of these Indians, the common bond was
similarity of language as well as frequency and cordiality of intercourse.
In so primitive a condition of society there was neither necessity nor
opportunity for differences of rank. The influence of chiefs was small and
no distinct classes of slaves were known. Extreme poverty was the chief
cause of the low social and political organization of these Indians. The
Maidus in the Sacramento Valley were so poor that, in addition to
consuming every possible vegetable product, they not only devoured all
birds except the buzzard, but ate badgers, skunks, wildcats, and mountain
lions, and even consumed salmon bones and deer vertebrae. They gathered
grasshoppers and locusts by digging large shallow pits in a meadow or
flat. Then, setting fire to the grass on all sides, they drove the insects
into the pit. Their wings being burned off by the flames, the grasshoppers
were helpless and were thus collected by the bushel. Again of the
Moquelumne, one of the largest tribes in central California, it is said
that their houses were simply frameworks of poles and brush which in
winter were covered with earth. In summer they erected cone-shaped lodges
of poles among the mountains. In favorable years they gathered large
quantities of acorns, which formed their principal food, and stored them
for winter use in granaries raised above the ground. Often, however, the
crop was poor, and the Indians were left on the verge of starvation.
Finally in the far south, in the peninsula of Lower California, the tribes
were "probably the lowest in culture of any Indians in North America, for
their inhospitable environment which made them wanderers, was unfavorable
to the foundation of government even of the rude and unstable kind found
elsewhere." The Yuman tribes of the mountains east of Santiago wore
sandals of maguey fiber and descended from their own territory among the
mountains "to eat calabash and other fruits" that grew beside the Colorado
River. They were described as "very dirty on account of the much mescal
they eat." Others speak of them as "very filthy in their habits. To
overcome vermin they coat their heads with mud with which they also paint
their bodies. On a hot day it is by no means unusual to see them wallowing
in the mud like pigs." They were "exceedingly poor, having no animals
except foxes of which they had a few skins. The dress of the women in
summer was a shirt and a bark skirt. The men appear to have been
practically unclothed during this season. The practice of selling children
seems to have been common. Their sustenance was fish, fruits, vegetables,
and seeds of grass, and many of the tribes were said to have been
dreadfully scorbutic." A little to the east of these degraded savages the
much more advanced Mohave tribe had its home on the lower Colorado River.
The contrast between these neighboring tribes throws much light on the
reason for the low estate of the California Indians. "No better example of
the power of environment to better man's condition can be found than that
shown as the lower Colorado is reached. Here are tribes of the same family
(as those of Lower California) remarkable not only for their fine physical
development, but living in settled villages with well-defined tribal
lines, practising a rude, but effective, agriculture, and well advanced in
many primitive Indian arts. The usual Indian staples were raised except
tobacco, these tribes preferring a wild tobacco of their region to the
cultivated."(*)
(* Hodge, "Handbook of American Indians")
This quotation is highly significant. With it should be compared the fact
that there is no evidence that corn or anything else was cultivated in
California west of the Rio Colorado Valley. California is a region famous
throughout America for its agriculture, but its crops are European in
origin. Even in the case of fruits, such as the grape, which have American
counterparts, the varieties actually cultivated were brought from Europe.
Wheat and barley, the chief foodstuffs for which California and similar
subtropical regions are noted, were unknown in the New World before the
coming of the white man. In pre-Columbian America corn was the only
cultivated cereal. The other great staples of early American agriculture
were beans and pumpkins. All three are preeminently summer crops and need
much water in July and August. In California there is no rain at this
season. Though the fall rains, which begin to be abundant in October and
November, do not aid these summer crops, they favor wheat and barley. The
winter rains and the comparatively warm winter weather permit these grains
to grow slowly but continuously. When the warm spring arrives, there is
still enough rain to permit wheat and barley to make a rapid growth and to
mature their seeds long before the long, dry summer begins. The
comparatively dry weather of May and June is just what these cereals need
to ripen the crop, but it is fatal to any kind of agriculture which
depends on summer rain.
Crops can of course be grown during the summer in California by means of
irrigation, but this is rarely a simple process. If irrigation is to be
effective in California, it cannot depend on the small streams which
practically dry up during the long, rainless summer, but it must depend on
comparatively large streams which flow in well-defined channels. With our
modern knowledge and machinery it is easy for us to make canals and
ditches and to prepare the level fields needed to utilize this water. A
people with no knowledge of agriculture, however, and with no iron tools
cannot suddenly begin to practice a complex and highly developed system of
agriculture. In California there is little or none of the natural summer
irrigation which, in certain parts of America, appears to have been the
most important factor leading to the first steps in tilling the ground.
The lower Colorado, however, floods broad areas every summer. Here, as on
the Nile, the retiring floods leave the land so moist that crops can
easily be raised. Hence the Mohave Indians were able to practice
agriculture and to rise well above their kinsmen not only in Lower
California but throughout the whole State.
In the Rocky Mountain region of the United States, just as on the Pacific
coast, the condition of the tribes deteriorated more and more the farther
they lived to the south. In the regions where the rainfall comes in
summer, however, and hence favors primitive agriculture, there was a
marked improvement. The Kutenai tribes lived near the corner where Idaho,
Montana, and British Columbia now meet. They appear to have been of rather
high grade, noteworthy for their morality, kindness, and hospitality. More
than any other Indians of the Rocky Mountain region, they avoided
drunkenness and lewd intercourse with the whites. Their mental ability was
comparatively high, as appears from their skill in buffalo-hunting, in
making dugouts and bark canoes, and in constructing sweat-houses and
lodges of both skins and rushes. Even today the lower Kutenai are noted
for their water-tight baskets of split roots. Moreover the degree to which
they used the plants that grew about them for food, medicine, and
economical purposes was noteworthy. They also had an esthetic appreciation
of several plants and flowers--a gift rare among Indians. These people
lived in the zone of most stimulating climate and, although they did not
practice agriculture and had little else in their surroundings to help
them to rise above the common level, they dwelt in a region where there
was rain enough in summer to prevent their being on the verge of
starvation, as the Indians of California usually were. Moreover they were
near enough to the haunts of the buffalo to depend on that great beast for
food. Since one buffalo supplies as much food as a hundred rabbits, these
Indians were vastly better off than the people of the drier parts of the
western coast.
South of the home of the Kutenai, in eastern Oregon, southern Idaho,
Nevada, Utah, and neighboring regions dwelt the Utes and other Shoshoni
tribes. In this region the rainfall, which is no greater than that of
California, occurs chiefly in winter. The long summer is so dry that,
except by highly developed methods of irrigation, agriculture is
impossible. Hence it is not surprising to find a traveler in 1850
describing one tribe of the Ute family as "without exception the most
miserable looking set of human beings I ever saw. They have hitherto
subsisted principally on snakes, lizards, roots." The lowest of all the
Ute tribes were those who lived in the sage-brush. The early explorer,
Bonneville, found the tribes of Snake River wintering in brush shelters
without roofs merely heaps of brush piled high, behind which the Indians
crouched for protection from wind and snow. Crude as such shelters may
seem, they were the best that could be constructed by people who dwelt
where there was no vegetation except little bushes, and where the soil was
for the most part sandy or so salty that it could not easily be made into
adobe bricks.
The food of these Utes and Shoshonis was no better than their shelters.
There were no large animals for them to hunt; rabbits were the best that
they could find. Farther to the east, where the buffalo wandered during
part of the year and where there are some forests, the food was better,
the shelters were more effective, and, in general, the standard of living
was higher, although racially the two groups of people were alike. In this
case, as in others, the people whose condition was lowest were apparently
as competent as those whose material conditions were much better. Today,
although the Ute Indians, like most of their race, are rather slow, some
tribes, such as the Payutes, are described as not only "peaceful and
moral," but also "industrious." They are highly commended for their good
qualities by those who have had the best opportunities for judging. While
not as bright in intellect as some of the prairie tribes whom we shall
soon consider, they appear to possess more solidity of character. By their
willingness and efficiency as workers they have made themselves necessary
to the white farmers and have thus supplied themselves with good clothing
and many of the comforts of life. They have resisted, too, many of the
evils coming from the advance of civilization, so that one agent speaks of
these Indians as presenting the singular anomaly of improving by contact
with the whites. Apparently their extremely low condition in former times
was due merely to that same handicap of environment which kept back the
Indians of California.
Compare these backward but not wholly ungifted Utes with the Hopi who
belonged to the same stock. The relatively high social organization of the
latter people and the intricacy and significance of their religious
ceremonials are well known. Mentally the Hopi seem to be the equal of any
tribe, but it is doubtful whether they have much more innate capacity than
many of their more backward neighbors. Nevertheless they made much more
progress before the days of the white man, as can easily be seen in their
artistic development. Every one who has crossed the continent by the Santa
Fe route knows how interesting and beautiful are their pottery, basketry,
and weaving. Not only in art but also in government the Hopi are highly
advanced. Their governing body is a council of hereditary elders together
with the chiefs of religious fraternities. Among these officials there is
a speaker chief and a war chief, but there seems never to have been any
supreme chief of all the Hopi. Each pueblo has an hereditary chief who
directs all the communal work, such as the cleaning of the springs and the
general care of the village. Crimes are rare. This at first sight seems
strange in view of the fact that no penalty was inflicted for any crime
except sorcery, but under Hopi law all transgressions could be reduced to
sorcery. One of the most striking features of Hopi life was its rich
religious development. The Hopi recognized a large number of supernatural
beings and had a great store of most interesting and poetic mythological
tales. The home of the Hopi would seem at first sight as unfavorable to
progress as that of their Ute cousins, but the Hopi have the advantage of
being the most northwesterly representatives of the Indians who dwell
within the regions of summer rain. Fortunately for them, their country is
too desert and unforested for them to subsist to any great degree by the
chase. They are thus forced to devote all their energy to agriculture,
through which they have developed a relatively high standard of living.
They dwell far enough south to have their heaviest rainfall in summer and
not in winter, as is the case in Utah, so that they are able to cultivate
crops of corn and beans. Where such an intensive system of agriculture
prevails, the work of women is as valuable as that of men. The position of
woman is thus relatively high among the Hopi, for she is useful not only
for her assistance in the labors of the field but also for her skill in
preserving the crops, grinding the flour, and otherwise preparing the
comparatively varied food which this tribe fortunately possesses.
From northern New Mexico and Arizona to Mexico City summer rains, dry
winters, and still drier springs, are the rule. Forests are few, and much
of the country is desert. The more abundant the rains, the greater the
number of people and the greater the opportunities for the accumulation of
wealth, and thus for that leisure which is necessary to part of a
community if civilization is to make progress. That is one reason why the
civilization of the summer rain people becomes more highly developed as
they go from north to south. The fact that the altitude of the country
increases from the United States border southward also tends in the same
direction, for it causes the climate to be cooler and more bracing at
Mexico City than at places farther north.
The importance of summer rains in stimulating growth and in facilitating
the early stages of agriculture is noteworthy. Every one familiar with
Arizona and New Mexico knows how the sudden summer showers fill the
mountain valleys with floods which flow down upon the plain and rapidly
spread out into broad, thin sheets, often known as playas. There the water
stands a short time and then either sinks into the ground or evaporates.
Such places are favored with the best kind of natural irrigation, and
after the first shower it is an easy matter for the primitive farmer to go
out and drop grains of corn into holes punched with a stick. Thereafter he
can count on other showers to water his field while the corn sprouts and
grows to maturity. All that he needs to do is to watch the field to
protect it from the rare depredations of wild animals. As time goes on the
primitive farmer realizes the advantage of leading the water to
particularly favorable spots and thus begins to develop a system of
artificial irrigation. In regions where such advantageous conditions
prevail, the people who live permanently in one place succeed best, for
the work that they do one year helps them the next. They are not greatly
troubled by weeds, for, though grasses grow as well as corn in the places
where the water spreads out, the grasses take the form of little clumps
which can easily be pulled up. In the drier parts of the area of summer
rain, it becomes necessary to conserve the water supply to the utmost. The
Hopi consider sandy fields the best, for the loose sand on top acts as a
natural blanket to prevent evaporation from the underlying layers.
Sometimes in dry seasons the Hopi use extraordinary methods to help their
seeds to sprout. For instance, they place a seed in a ball of saturated
mud which they bury beneath several inches of sand. As the sand prevents
evaporation, practically all the water is retained for the use of the
seed, which thereupon sprouts and grows some inches by the time the first
summer floods arrive.
The Indians of the Great Plains lived a very different life from that of
the natives of either the mountains or the Pacific coast. In the far
north, to be sure, the rigorous climate caused all the Indians to live
practically alike, whether in the Rockies, the plains, or the Laurentian
highland. South of them, in that great central expanse stretching from the
latitude of Lake Winnipeg to the Rio Grande River, the Indians of the
plains possessed a relatively uniform type of life peculiar to themselves.
This individuality was due partly to the luxuriant carpet of grass which
covered the plains and partly to the supply of animal food afforded by the
vast herds of buffaloes which roamed in tens of thousands throughout the
whole territory. The grass was important chiefly because it prevented the
Indians from engaging in agriculture, for it must never be forgotten that
the Indians had neither iron tools nor beasts of burden to aid them in
overcoming the natural difficulties in the way of agriculture. To be sure,
they did occasionally pound meteoric iron into useful implements, but this
substance was so rare that probably not one Indian in a hundred had ever
seen a piece. The Indians were quite familiar with copper, but there is
not the slightest evidence that they had discovered any means of hardening
it. Metals played no real part in the life of any of the Indians of
America, and without such tools as iron spades and hoes it was impossible
for them to cultivate grassland. If they burned the prairie and dropped
seeds into holes, the corn or beans which they thus planted were sure to
be choked by the quickly springing grass. To dig away the tough sod around
the hole for each seed would require an almost incredible amount of work
even with iron tools. To accomplish this with wooden spades, rude hoes
made of large flakes of flint, or the shoulder blades of the buffalo, was
impossible on any large scale. Now and then in some river bottom where the
grass grew in clumps and could be easily pulled up, a little agriculture
was possible. That is all that seems to have been attempted on the great
grassy plains.
The Indians could not undertake any widespread cultivation of the plains
not only because they lacked iron tools but also because they had no draft
animals. The buffalo was too big, too fierce, and too stupid to be
domesticated. In all the length and breadth of the two Americas there was
no animal to take the place of the useful horse, donkey, or ox. The llama
was too small to do anything but carry light loads, and it could live only
in a most limited area among the cold Andean highlands. Even if the
aboriginal Americans could have made iron ploughs, they could not have
ploughed the tough sod without the aid of animals. Moreover, even if the
possession of metal tools and beasts of burden had made agriculture
possible in the grass-lands, it would have been difficult, in the absence
of wood for fences, to prevent the buffalo from eating up the crops or at
least from tramping through them and spoiling them. Thus the fertile land
of the great plains remained largely unused until the white man came to
the New World bringing the iron tools and domestic animals that were
necessary to successful agriculture.
Although farming of any sort was almost as impossible in the plains as in
the dry regions of winter rains farther west, the abundance of buffaloes
made life much easier in many respects. It is astonishing to see how many
purposes these animals served. An early traveler who dwelt among one of
the buffalo-hunting tribes, the Tonkawa of central Texas, says: "Besides
their meat it [the buffalo] furnishes them liberally what they desire for
conveniences. The brains are used to soften skins, the horns for spoons
and drinking cups, the shoulder blades to dig up and clear off the ground,
the tendons for threads and bow strings, the hoofs to glue the arrow-
feathering. From the tail-hair they make ropes and girths, from the wool,
belts and various ornaments. The hide furnishes . . . shields, tents,
shirts, footwear, and blankets to protect them from the cold."(*)
(* See Hodge, "Handbook of American Indians," vol. II, p. 781)
The buffalo is a surprisingly stupid animal. When a herd is feeding it is
possible for a man to walk into the midst of it and shoot down an animal.
Even when one of their companions falls dead, the buffaloes pay no
attention to the hunter provided he remains perfectly still. The wounded
animals are not at first dangerous but seek to flee. Only when pursued and
brought to bay do they turn on their pursuers. When the Indians of an
encampment united their forces, as was their regular habit, they were able
to slaughter hundreds of animals in a few days. The more delicate parts of
the meat they ate first, often without cooking them. The rest they dried
and packed away for future use, while they prepared the hides as coverings
for the tents or as rugs in which to sleep.
Wherever the buffaloes were present in large numbers, the habits of the
Indians were much the same. They could not live in settled villages, for
there was no assurance that the buffalo would come to any particular place
each year. The plains tribes were therefore more thoroughly nomadic than
almost any others, especially after the introduction of horses. Because
they wandered so much, they came into contact with other tribes to an
unusual degree, and much of the contact was friendly. Gradually the
Indians developed a sign language by which tribes of different tongues
could communicate with one another. At first these signs were like
pictographs, for the speaker pointed as nearly as possible to the thing
that he desired to indicate, but later they became more and more
conventional. For example, man, the erect animal, was indicated by
throwing up the hand, with its back outward and the index finger extending
upward. Woman was indicated by a sweeping downward movement of the hand at
the side of the head with fingers extended to denote long hair or the
combing of flowing locks.
Among the plains Indians, the Dakotas, the main tribe of the Sioux family,
are universally considered to have stood highest not only physically but
mentally, and probably morally. Their bravery was never questioned, and
they conquered or drove out every rival except the Chippewas. Their
superiority was clearly seen in their system of government. Personal
fitness and popularity determined chieftainship more than did heredity.
The authority of the chief was limited by the Band Council, without whose
approbation little or nothing could be accomplished. In one of the Dakota
tribes, the Tetons, the policing of a village was confided to two or three
officers who were appointed by the chief and who remained in power until
their successors were appointed. Day and night they were always on the
watch, and so arduous were their labors that their term of service was
necessarily short. The brevity of their term, however, was atoned for by
the greatness of their authority, for in the suppression of disturbances
no resistance was suffered. Their persons were sacred, and if in the
execution of their duty they struck even a chief of the second class they
could not be punished.
The Dakotas, who lived in the region where their name is still preserved,
inhabited that part of the great plain which is climatically most
favorable to great activity. It is perhaps because of their response to
the influence of this factor of geographical environment that they and
their neighbors are the best known of the plains tribes. Their activity in
later times is evident from the fact that the Tetons were called "the
plundering Arabs of America." If their activities had been more wisely
directed, they might have made a great name for themselves in Indian
history. In the arts they stood as high as could be expected in view of
the wandering life which they led and the limited materials with which
they had to work. In the art of making pictographs, for instance, they
excelled all other tribes, except perhaps the Kiowas, a plains tribe of
Colorado and western Kansas. On the hides of buffalo, deer, and antelope
which formed their tents, the Dakotas painted calendars, which had a
picture for each year, or rather for each winter, while those of the
Kiowas had a summer symbol and a winter symbol. Probably these calendars
reveal the influence of the whites, but they at least show that these
people of the plains were quickwitted.
Farther south the tribes of the plains stood on a much lower level than
the Dakotas. The Spanish explorer, Cabeza de Vaca, describes the Yguases
in Texas, among whom he lived for several years, in these words: "Their
support is principally roots which require roasting two days. Many are
very bitter. Occasionally they take deer and at times fish, but the
quantity is so small and the famine so great that they eat spiders and
eggs of ants, worms, lizards, salamanders, snakes, and vipers that kill
whom they strike, and they eat earth and all that there is, the dung of
deer, things I omit to mention and I earnestly believe that were there
stones in that land they would eat them. They save the bones of the fish
they consume, the snakes and other animals, that they may afterward beat
them together and eat the powder." During these painful periods, they bade
Cabeza de Vaca "not to be sad. There would soon be prickly pears, although
the season of this fruit of the cactus might be months distant. When the
pears were ripe, the people feasted and danced and forgot their former
privations. They destroyed their female infants to prevent them being
taken by their enemies and thus becoming the means of increasing the
latter's number."
East of the Great Plains there dwelt still another important type of
Indians, the people of the deciduous forests. Their home extended from the
Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico. As we have already seen, the Iroquois
who inhabited the northern part of this region were in many respects the
highest product of aboriginal America. The northern Iroquois tribes,
especially those known as the Five Nations, were second to no other Indian
people north of Mexico in political organization, statecraft, and military
prowess. Their leaders were genuine diplomats, as the wily French and
English statesmen with whom they treated soon discovered. One of their
most notable traits was the reverence which they had for the tribal law.
The wars that they waged were primarily for political independence, for
the fundamental principle of their confederation was that by uniting with
one another they would secure the peace and welfare of all with whom they
were connected by ties of blood. They prevented blood feuds by decreeing
that there should be a price for the killing of a co-tribesman, and they
abstained from eating the flesh of their enemies in order to avoid future
strife. So thoroughly did they believe in the rights of the individual
that women were accorded a high position. Among some of the tribes the
consent of all the women who had borne children was required before any
important measure could be taken. Candidates for a chiefship were
nominated by the votes of the mothers, and, as lands and houses were the
property of the women, their power in the tribe was great.
The Iroquois were sedentary and agricultural, and depended on the chase
for only a small part of their existence. The northern tribes were
especially noted for their skill in building fortifications and houses.
Their so-called castles were solid wooden structures with platforms
running around the top on the inside. From the platforms stones and other
missiles could be hurled down upon besiegers. According to our standards
such dwellings were very primitive, but they were almost as great an
advance upon the brush piles of the Utes as our skyscrapers are upon them.
Farther south in the Carolinas, the Cherokees, another Iroquoian tribe,
stand out prominently by reason of their unusual mental ability. Under the
influence of the white man, the Cherokees were the first to adopt a
constitutional form of government embodied in a code of laws written in
their own language. Their language was reduced to writing by means of an
alphabet which one of their number named Sequoya had devised. Sequoya and
other leaders, however, may not have been pure Indians, for by that time
much white blood had been mixed with the tribe. Yet even before the coming
of the white man the Cherokees were apparently more advanced in
agriculture than the Iroquois were, but less advanced in their form of
government, in their treatment of women, and in many other respects. In
general, as we go from north to south in the region of deciduous forests,
we find that among the early Indians agriculture became more and more
important and the people more sedentary, though not always more
progressive in other ways. The Catawbas, for instance, in South Carolina
were sedentary agriculturists and seem to have differed little in general
customs from their neighbors. Their men were brave and honest but lacking
in energy. In the Muskhogean family of Indians, comprising the Creeks,
Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles, who occupied the Gulf States from
Georgia to Mississippi, all the tribes were agricultural and sedentary and
occupied villages of substantial houses. The towns near the tribal
frontiers were usually palisaded, but those more remote from invasion were
unprotected. All these Indians were brave but not warlike in the violent
fashion of the Five Nations. The Choctaws would fight only in self-
defense, it was said, but the Creeks and especially the Chickasaws were
more aggressive. In their government these Muskhogean tribes appear to
have attained a position corresponding to their somewhat advanced culture
in other respects. Yet their confederacies were loose and flimsy compared
with that of the Five Nations. Another phase of the life of the tribes in
the southern part of the region of deciduous forests is illustrated by the
Natchez of Mississippi. These people were strictly sedentary and depended
chiefly upon agriculture for a livelihood. They possessed considerable
skill in the arts. For instance, they wove a cloth from the inner bark of
the mulberry tree and made excellent pottery. They also constructed great
mounds of earth upon which to erect their dwellings and temples. Like a
good many of the other southern tribes, they fought when it was necessary,
but they were peaceable compared with the Five Nations. They had a form of
sun-worship resembling that of Mexico, and in other ways their ideas were
like those of the people farther south. For instance, when a chief died,
his wives were killed. In times of distress the parents frequently offered
their children as sacrifice.
Many characteristics of the Natchez and other southern tribes seem to
indicate that they had formerly possessed a civilization higher than that
which prevailed when the white man came. The Five Nations, on the
contrary, apparently represent an energetic people who were on the upward
path and who might have achieved great things if the whites had not
interrupted them. The southern Indians resemble people whose best days
were past, for the mounds which abound in the Gulf States appear to have
been built chiefly in pre-Columbian days. Their objects of art, such as
the remarkable wooden mortars found at Key Marco and the embossed copper
plates found elsewhere in Florida, point to a highly developed artistic
sense which was no longer in evidence at the coming of the white man.
It is interesting to see the way in which climatic energy tended to give
the Five Nations a marked superiority over the tribesmen of the South,
while agriculture tended in the opposite direction. There has been much
discussion as to the part played by agriculture among the primitive
Americans, especially in the northeast. Corn, beans, and squashes were an
important element in the diet of the Indians of the New England region,
while farther south potatoes, sunflower seeds, and melons were also
articles of food. The New England tribes knew enough about agriculture to
use fish and shells for fertilizer. They had wooden mattocks and hoes made
from the shoulder blades of deer, from tortoise shells, or from conch
shells set in handles. They also had stone hoes and spades, while the
women used short pickers or parers about a foot long and five inches wide.
Seated on the ground they used these to break the upper part of the soil
and to grub out weeds, grass, and old cornstalks. They had the regular
custom of burning over an old patch each year and then replanting it.
Sometimes they merely put the seeds in holes and sometimes they dug up and
loosened the ground for each seed. Clearings they made by girdling the
trees, that is, by cutting off the bark in a circle at the bottom and thus
causing the tree to die. The brush they hacked or broke down and burned
when it was dry enough.
There is much danger of confusing the agricultural condition of the Indian
after the European had modified his life with his condition before the
European came to America. For instance, in the excellent article on
agriculture in the "Handbook of American Indians," conditions prevailing
as late as 1794 in the States south of the Great Lakes are spoken of as if
typical of aboriginal America. But at that time the white man had long
been in contact with the Indian, and iron tools had largely taken the
place of stone. The rapidity with which European importations spread may
be judged by the fact that as early as 1736 the Iroquois in New York not
only had obtained horses but were regularly breeding them. The use of the
iron axe of course spread with vastly greater rapidity than that of the
horse, for an axe or a knife was the first thing that an Indian sought
from the white man. In the eighteenth century agriculture had thus become
immeasurably easier than before, yet even then the Indians still kept up
their old habit of cultivating the same fields only a short time. The
regular practice was to cultivate a field five, ten, and sometimes even
twenty or more years, and then abandon it.(*)
(* Ordinarily it is stated that this practice was due to the exhaustion of
the soil. That, however, is open to question, for five or ten years'
desultory cultivation on the part of the Indian would scarcely exhaust the
soil so much that people would go to the great labor of making new
clearings and moving their villages. Moreover, in the Southern States it
is well known today that the soil is exhausted much more rapidly than
farther north because it contains less humus. Nevertheless the southern
tribes cultivated the land about their villages for long periods. Tribes
like the Creeks, the Cherokees, and the Natchez appear to have been
decidedly less prone to move than the Iroquois, in spite of the relatively
high development of these northern nations.)
What hindered agriculture most in the northern part of the deciduous
forest was the grass. Any one who has cultivated a garden knows how
rapidly the weeds grow. He also knows that there is no weed so hard to
exterminate as grass. When once it gets a foothold mere hoeing seems only
to make it grow the faster. The only way to get rid of grass when once it
has become well established is to plow the field and start over again, but
this the Indians could not do. When first a clearing was made in the midst
of the forest, there was no grass to be contended with. Little by little,
however, it was sure to come in, until at length what had been a garden
was in a fair way to become a meadow. Then the Indians would decide that
it was necessary to seek new fields.
One might suppose that under such circumstances the Indians would merely
clear another patch of forest not far from the village and so continue to
live in the old place. This, however, they did not do because the labor of
making a clearing with stone axes and by the slow process of girdling and
burning the trees was so great that it was possible only in certain
favored spots where by accident the growth was less dense than usual. When
once a clearing became grassy, the only thing to do was to hunt for a new
site, prepare a clearing, and then move the village. This was apparently
the reason why the Iroquois, although successful in other ways, failed to
establish permanent towns like those of the Pueblos and the Haidas. Their
advancement not only in architecture but in many of the most important
elements of civilization was for this reason greatly delayed. There was
little to stimulate them to improve the land to which they were attached,
for they knew that soon they would have to move.
Farther south the character of the grassy vegetation changes, and the
condition of agriculture alters with it. The grass ceases to have that
thick, close, turfy quality which we admire so much in the fields of the
north, and it begins to grow in bunches. Often a southern hillside may
appear from a distance to be as densely covered with grass as a New
England hayfield. On closer examination, however, the growth is seen to
consist of individual bunches which can easily be pulled up, so that among
the southern tribes the fields did not become filled with grass as they
did in the north, for the women had relatively little difficulty in
keeping out this kind of weed as well as others.
In this survey of aboriginal America we have been impressed by the
contrast between two diverse aspects of the control of human activities by
physical environment. We saw, in the first place, that in our own day the
distribution of culture in America is more closely related to climatic
energy than to any other factor, because man is now so advanced in the
arts and crafts that agricultural difficulties do not impede him, except
in the far north and in tropical forests. Secondly, we have found that,
although all the geographical factors acted upon the Indian as they do
today, the absence of metals and beasts of burden compelled man to be
nomadic, and hence to remain in a low stage of civilization in many places
where he now can thrive. In the days long before Columbus the distribution
of civilization in the Red Man's Continent offered still a third aspect,
strikingly different both from that of today and from that of the age of
discovery. In that earlier period the great centers of civilization were
south of their present situation. In the southern part of North America
from Arizona to Florida there are abundant evidences that the Indians whom
the white man found were less advanced than their predecessors. The
abundant ruins of Arizona and New Mexico, their widespread distribution,
and the highly artistic character of the pottery and other products of
handicraft found in them seem to indicate that the ancient population was
both denser and more highly cultured than that which the Europeans finally
ousted. In the Gulf States there is perhaps not much evidence that there
was a denser population at an earlier period, but the excellence of the
pre-Columbian handicrafts and the existence of a decadent sun worship
illustrate the way in which the civilization of the past was higher than
that of later days. The Aztecs, who figure so largely in the history of
the exploration and conquest of Mexico, were merely a warlike tribe which
had been fortunate in the inheritance of a relatively high civilization
from the past. So, too, the civilization found by the Spaniards at places
such as Mitla, in the extreme south of Mexico, could not compare with that
of which evidence is found in the ruins. Most remarkable of all is the
condition of Yucatan and Guatemala. In northern Yucatan the Spaniards
found a race of mild, decadent Mayas living among the relics of former
grandeur. Although they used the old temples as shrines, they knew little
of those who had built these temples and showed still less capacity to
imitate the ancient architects. Farther south in the forested region of
southern Yucatan and northern Guatemala the conditions are still more
surprising, for today these regions are almost uninhabitable and are
occupied by only a few sickly, degraded natives who live largely by the
chase. Yet in the past this region was the scene of by far the highest
culture that ever developed in America. There alone in this great
continent did men develop an architecture which, not only in massiveness
but in wealth of architectural detail and sculptural adornment, vies with
that of early Egypt or Chaldea. There alone did the art of writing
develop. Yet today in those regions the density of the forest, the
prevalence of deadly fevers, the extremely enervating temperature, and the
steady humidity are as hostile to civilization as are the cold of the far
north and the dryness of the desert.
The only explanation of this anomaly seems to be that in the past the
climatic zones of the world have at certain periods been shifted farther
toward the equator than they are at present. Practically all the
geographers of America now believe that within the past two or three
thousand years climatic pulsations have taken place whereby places like
the dry Southwest have alternately experienced centuries of greater
moisture than at present and centuries as dry as today or even drier.
During the moist centuries greater storminess prevailed, so that the
climate was apparently better not only for agriculture but for human
energy. At such times the standard of living was higher than now not only
in the Southwest but in the Gulf States and in Mexico. In periods when the
deserts of the southwestern United States were wet, the Maya region of
Yucatan and Guatemala appears to have been relatively dry. Then the dry
belt which now extends from northern Mexico to the northern tip of Yucatan
apparently shifted southward. Such conditions would cause the forests of
Yucatan and Guatemala to become much less dense than at present. This
comparative deforestation would make agriculture easily possible where
today it is out of the question. At the same time the relatively dry
climate and the clearing away of the vegetation would to a large degree
eliminate the malarial fevers and other diseases which are now such a
terrible scourge in wet tropical countries. Then, too, the storms which at
the present time give such variability to the climate of the United States
would follow more southerly courses. In its stimulating qualities the
climate of the home of the Mayas in the days of their prime was much more
nearly like that which now prevails where civilization rises highest.
From first to last the civilization of America has been bound up with its
physical environment. It matters little whether we are dealing with the
red race, the black, or the white. Nor does it matter whether we deal with
one part of the continent or another. Wherever we turn we can trace the
influence of mountains and plains, of rocks and metals from which tools
are made, of water and its finny inhabitants, of the beasts of the chase
from the hare to the buffalo, of domestic animals, of the native forests,
grass-lands, and deserts, and, last but not least, of temperature,
moisture, and wind in their direct effects upon the human body. At one
stage of human development the possibilities of agriculture may be the
dominant factor in man's life in early America. At another, domestic
animals may be more important, and at still another, iron or waterways or
some other factor may be predominant. It is the part of the later history
of the American Continent to trace the effect of these various factors and
to chronicle the influence that they have had upon man's progress.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
Although many books deal with the physical features of the Western
Hemisphere and many others with the Indians, few deal with the two in
relation to one another. One book, however, stands out preeminent in this
respect, namely, Edward John Payne's "History of the New World Called
America," 2 vols. (1892-99). This book, which has never been finished,
attempts to explain the conditions of life among the American aborigines
as the result of geographical conditions, especially of the food supply.
Where the author carries this attempt into the field of special customs
and religious rites, he goes too far. Nevertheless his work is uncommonly
stimulating and deserves the careful attention of the reader who would
gain a broad grasp of the relation of geography to the history of the New
World.
Two other good books which deal with the relation of geography to American
history are Miss Ellen C. Semple's "American History and its Geographical
Conditions" (1903) and A. P. Brigham's "Geographic Influences in American
History" (1903). Both of these books interpret geography as if it included
little except the form of the land. While they bring out clearly the
effect of mountain barriers, indented coasts, and easy routes whether by
land or water, they scarcely touch on the more subtle relationships
between man on the one hand and the climate, plants, and animals which
form the dominant features of his physical environment on the other hand.
In their emphasis on the form of the land both Semple and Brigham follow
the lead of W. M. Davis. In his admirable articles on America and the
United States in "The Encyclopaedia Britannica" (11th edition) and in The
International Geography edited by H. R. Mill (1901), Davis has given an
uncommonly clear and vivid description of the main physical features of
the New World. Living beings, however, play little part in this
description, so that the reader is not led to an understanding of how
physical geography affects human actions.
Other good descriptions of the North American continent are found in the
following books: I. C. Russell's "North America" (1904), Stanford's
"Compendium of Modern Geography and Travel," including the volumes on
Canada, the United States, and Central America, and the great volumes on
America in "The Earth and its Inhabitants" by Elise Reclus, 19 vols. (1876-
1894). Russell's book is largely physiographic but contains some good
chapters on the Indians. In Stanford's "Compendium" the purpose is to
treat man and nature in their relation to one another, but the
relationships are not clearly brought out, and there is too much emphasis
on purely descriptive and encyclopedic matter. So far as interest is
concerned, the famous work by Elise Reclus holds high rank. It is an
encyclopedia of geographical facts arranged and edited in such a way that
it has all the interest of a fine book of travel. Like most of the other
books, however, it fails to bring out relationships.
As sources of information on the Indians, two books stand out with special
prominence. "The American Race," by D. G. Brinton (1891), is a most
scholarly volume devoted largely to a study of the Indians on a linguistic
basis. It contains some general chapters, however, on the Indians and
their environment, and these are most illuminating. The other book is the
"Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico," edited by F. W. Hodge, and
published by the United States Bureau of Ethnology (Washington, 1897,
1910, 1911). Its two large volumes are arranged in encyclopedic form. The
various articles are written by a large number of scholars, including
practically all the students who were at work on Indian ethnology at the
time of publication. Many of the articles are the best that have been
written and will not only interest the general reader but will contribute
to an understanding of what America was when the Indians came here and
what it still is today.
The Red Man's Continent - End of Chapters V-Bibliographical Note
Search All Library Items
How to Donate Books & Money
WebRoots Home Page ~
Library Main Page ~
Catalog Main Page
List of Newest & All Library Items ~
Contact WebRoots
Contents of this Website (c) WebRoots, Inc.
A Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation