WebRoots.org
Nonprofit Library for Genealogy & History-Related Research
A Free Resource Covering the United States
and Some International Areas
Library - United States - Military
Hessians in the Rev. War - Chapters V-VII
CHAPTER V.
FROM GERMANY TO AMERICA.
The first German troops to start for America were the Brunswickers. These
marched from Brunswick on February 22d, 1776, two thousand two hundred and
eighty-two strong, and were embarked at Stade, near the mouth of the Elbe.
The second division of Brunswickers embarked at the end of May - about two
thousand men. The first Hessians set out from Cassel early in March, and
were shipped at Bremerlehe, near the mouth of the Weser. The second
division was embarked in June. Together they numbered between twelve and
thirteen thousand men. They were for the most part excellent troops and
well equipped, for the Landgrave's little army was one of the best in
Germany.
The march from Brunswick or Cassel to the port of embarkation was a
comparatively simple matter. The troops passed from the territory of their
own prince into the Hanoverian dominions of the King of England, and these
reached to the sea. The Prince of Waldeck sent his regiment through Cassel
without trouble. The Prince of Hesse-Hanau, the Margrave of Anspach-
Bayreuth, and the Prince of Anhalt-Zerbst had a longer road and more
difficulties before them.
The town of Hanau lies above Frankfort, on the river Main, about thirty
miles from Mainz, where that river falls into the Rhine. The district of
which Hanau was the capital was at this time governed by the heir-apparent
of the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, as an independent county. The prince was
not on good terms with his father, and was unwilling to send his troops
through the territories of the latter, for fear of desertion. The soldiers
were therefore shipped on boats and sent down the Rhine. The three
spiritual electorates, the lands of the Elector of the Phalz, the free
city of Cologne, and other less important districts bordered on that
stretch of the river which the modern tourist passes in his steamboat
between breakfast and dinner-time. Any one of the little states might make
trouble if its permission for the passage of troops were not obtained, and
after running the gantlet of them all, there was danger of still more
serious hinderance when the flotilla came to Rhenish Prussia. Difficulties
had already arisen between the local authorities and the English
recruiting officers, and although the first regiment from Hanau, in the
spring of 1776, was allowed to pass unmolested, trouble was brewing.
A detachment of chasseurs and recruits started from Hanau on March 7th,
1777. On the 8th the boats were stopped at Mainz, and eight men were taken
from them. The archbishop claimed these either as his own subjects or as
deserters from his service. The English government refused to interfere,
and the complaints of the Prince of Hanau were unheeded. On March 25th, at
S'Gravendael, in Holland, seven men sprang overboard, and three of them
escaped, with the help of sympathizing peasants.
Meanwhile, two regiments of Anspach and Bayreuth, with one hundred and one
chasseurs and forty-four artillerymen (in all twelve hundred and eighty-
five men), had marched from Anspach on March 7th, 1777, and were embarked
at Ochsenfurth, a pretty little walled town lying on the Main about a
hundred miles above Hanau, and belonging at that time to the Bishop of
Wurzburg. The men were embarked towards evening, and their boats remained
at anchor through the night. The poor country lads were unused to their
crowded quarters, shivering with cold, and sickened by the smell of the
boats, in which, in their simplicity, they thought they were to sail to
America. Their grumbling grew at last into a mutiny, a poor, helpless
mutiny, without a plan, without a leader. At daybreak some of the soldiers
of the Anspach regiment, whose boat lay near the bank, laid a plank to the
shore and walked over it. They then dragged other boats to land, and in an
hour the miserable crowd of cold and hungry men was on shore, storming
with anger and refusing to yield to the threats and promises of its
officers. These acted prudently. They sent for food and wood to warm and
feed the starving mutineers. Unfortunately the inhabitants of Ochsenfurth
brought drink as well. The insubordination increased. The soldiers began
to wander away; but the chasseurs still obeyed orders. They were posted on
the surrounding hills and told to fire at deserters, "to frighten them."
The rioters returned the fire. Several men were wounded. The burghers of
Ochsenfurth shut their gates and drew up their drawbridges to keep
themselves out of harm's way. Towards evening the soldiers began to get
sober again, and were finally brought back into their ranks, some scores
of them having succeeded in escaping. The Bishop of Wurzburg sent hussars
and dragoons to help quell the riot. He was afterwards officially thanked
by the English government.
Meanwhile an express had been sent to warn the Margrave at Anspach. The
Margrave was startled. Here were twelve hundred men, with eighteen
thousand good English pounds, and next winter's little journey to Paris,
all in danger of making off at once. His Most Serene Highness threw
himself into the saddle, forgetting his watch and neglecting his carpet-
bag; (he had afterwards to borrow some clean shirts of his princely
neighbor of Hanau). He rode quickly through the night, and early morning
found him at Ochsenfurth. The regiments were drawn up and the Margrave
passed from man to man. He inquired into their grievances, and promised
forgiveness to all who would go to America. He announced that any man
might then and there leave the service, forfeiting his home, all his
property, and the princely favor. No one stirred. The soldiers were re-
embarked and taken down the Main. The Margrave accompanied them. The story
that he sat in one of the boats, with a cocked rifle, ready for future
deserters, seems to want authority.
The flotilla arrived at Mainz. About thirty officers and men had been sent
by the Bishop-Elector to visit it and take off deserters. They were
recalled, however, on account of the presence of the Margrave, and of the
two Hessian princes who were with him. The Elector prepared a grand dinner
for these distinguished guests, but they did not venture to accept it, and
only sent an officer to demand that the bridge should be opened,
threatening to blow it up in case of refusal. The bridge was opened in the
night, without the formal consent of the Elector, and the boats went on
their way. From this point, the voyage down the Rhine was unhindered, and
the troops were mustered into the English service in Holland. Each
regiment received a present of 100 ducats from the Margrave, and extra
rations during the journey.
The Margrave had accomplished his purpose and could return with a light
heart to Anspach. He set out for Paris on the 16th of October following,
with his good friend Lady Craven, having arranged that a new body of about
three hundred recruits and chasseurs should start down stream at the end
of the month, taking with them uniforms for his regiments. He had taken
the trouble to write to his uncle, the great Frederick of Prussia, asking
that the passage of these troops might be permitted; but he looked on this
request as a mere formality, and travelled off without waiting for an
answer (Elliot, the English Ambassador at Berlin, had sent a like request,
which also was refused. Elliot states in a letter to Suffolk that the
German princes had felt obliged to ask the permission of the court of
Berlin before letting out their soldiers to Great Britain, and that they
had obtained this permission. Kapp, "Friedrich der Grosse und die
Vereinigten Staaten," pp. 63-65.) He was destined to be disappointed. His
ministers at Anspach received and opened in due time the following letter,
written, as was usual with diplomatic correspondence, in the French
language:
"Potsdam, this 24th October, 1777.
"MONSIEUR MY NEPHEW! - I own to your Most Serene Highness that I never
think of the present war in America without being struck with the
eagerness of some German princes to sacrifice their troops in a quarrel
which does not concern them. My astonishment increases when I remember in
ancient history the wise and general aversion of our ancestors to wasting
German blood for the defence of foreign rights, which even became a law in
the German state.
"But I perceive that my patriotism is running away with me; and I return
to your Most Serene Highness's letter of the 14th, which excited it so
strongly. You ask for free passage for the recruits and baggage which you
wish to send to the corps of your troops in the service of Great Britain,
and I take the liberty of observing that if you wish them to go to
England, they will not even have to pass through my states, and that you
can send them a shorter way to be embarked. I submit this idea to the
judgment of your Most Serene Highness, and am none the less, with all the
tenderness I owe you, Monsieur my Nephew, your Most Serene Highness's good
uncle,
FREDERIC."
The ministers were perplexed. They thought it too late to keep back the
troops, and hoped to gain their end by negotiation. In this they did not
succeed. The soldiers were stopped on their passage down the Rhine, and
after spending a month in their boats, lying, for the most part, off the
little town of Bendorf, which belonged to the Margrave of Anspach, were
finally brought back to winter at Hanau. Their sufferings while crowded on
board the boats in the months of November and December, and only allowed
occasional exercise on shore, must have been great; but there were but few
desertions, for a cordon of troops lined the bank to prevent them. About
two hundred and fifty recruits from Hanau lay alongside of the Anspachers,
similarly detained, and these suffered much from fever.
The whole party of five hundred and thirty-four men marched in February
and March, 1778, overland to the coast, and was shipped in April for
England and America. The passage was a long one, and these men, who had
left Anspach early in November, 1777, were not landed in New York until
September, 1778.
The sudden refusal of Frederick the Great to allow the passage of troops
told most of all on the Zerbst regiment. In order to pass round the
Prussian dominions, this body was obliged to march through seven different
states and free cities. The result was disastrous. In the village of
Zeulenrode a deserter chased by a corporal sought refuge in an inn. The
corporal, in his anger and excitement, shot after him through the window
and killed the innkeeper's wife, who was sitting quietly in the room. The
peasants were enraged, and a riot shortly afterwards occurred, in which a
lieutenant was mortally injured. Moreover, the Prussian recruiting
officers saw their chance to pick up a few men, and once on the route
there was a skirmish with them and bloodshed. Three hundred and thirtyfour
men deserted in the course of ten days, leaving only four hundred and
ninety-four under the banners. The colonel succeeded, however, in
enlisting about one hundred and thirty recruits, to take the place of the
deserters, and six hundred and twenty-five men were thus shipped on April
22, 1778, at Stade. Making a quick passage, they arrived before Quebec
towards the last of May; but they had not come to the end of their
troubles. The commander of the place had received no orders concerning
them, and would not allow them to land. For three months the poor fellows
had to lie on shipboard in the St. Lawrence, before instructions could be
received from England.
Frederick the Great has left in his memoirs his own account of his reasons
for his conduct on this occasion.
"The King of England, who from caprice or obstinacy maintained Bute's
system, stiffened himself against the obstacles which arose under his
feet. With little consideration for the misfortunes which fell on his
people, he became all the more ardent in the execution of his designs; and
in order to obtain a superiority of force over the Americans, he had
negotiations carried on with all the courts of Germany to obtain what
little help they could still furnish. Germany already felt the evil
consequences of sending so many of her men into those distant climes, and
the King of Prussia did not like to see the Empire deprived of all its
defenders, especially in case of a new war; for in the troubles of 1756,
Lower Saxony and Westphalia alone had set on foot an army with which the
progress of the French had been stopped and disorganized. For this reason
he made difficulties for the passage of the troops of the princes allied
to England when they had to pass through Magdeburg, Minden, and the
district on the Lower Rhine. That was but a weak revenge for the bad
attitude which the court of London had assumed towards him concerning the
city and harbor of Dantzic. Nevertheless, the king did not care to push
matters too far, for long experience had taught him that one always finds
a host of enemies in the world, without taking the trouble to raise them
wantonly against oneself." ("OEuvres de Frederic le Grand," vol. vi. p.
117.)
These troublesome measures of Frederick were but temporary, and in 1778
the business returned to its old channels. The war of the Bavarian
Succession had then broken out, and Frederick was inclined to be more
conciliatory towards England. The whole relation of the King of Prussia to
our Revolutionary War is hardly worth the attention that has been bestowed
on it. It would appear that Frederick, owing to his dislike for the
British, and on grounds of general policy, gave orders to his ministers to
treat the American agents, Arthur and William Lee, with politeness, though
he was prevented by his political judgment from according them the
smallest advantage. "I propose," wrote he to his brother Henry, on June
17th, 1777, "to procrastinate in these negotiations, and to go over to the
side on which fortune shall declare herself." ("OEuvres Frederic le
Grand," vol. xxvi. p. 393.) Seeing, however, in the autumn of 1777, a good
opportunity to vent his spite against the English, to express his contempt
for what he considered a disgraceful business, to diminish the drain of
men from Germany, and, perhaps, to do a good turn to the Americans, with
whom he sympathized as the enemies of his enemies, he adopted the measures
above described. It is possible that Frederick was also influenced by a
personal dislike for "Monsieur his Nephew," who had long before embraced
the Austrian side in German politics.
As for the importance to America of the hindrance thus thrown in the way
of the mercenary princes, it seems to me that Kapp overrates it. It may
possibly have been the want of the reinforcements thus delayed and the
uncertainty of obtaining more men in the future that prevented Sir William
Howe from destroying Washington's army at Valley Forge, and completely
stamping out the rebellion. But such a consequence of the delay in
receiving fifteen hundred men, and of the abandonment of a scheme for
obtaining a few thousands more from Wurtemberg, seems to me too remote for
serious consideration. Is there any reason to suppose that Sir William
would have made a better use of the fifteen hundred German soldiers he
expected than of the twelve or fifteen thousand he had already? The great
king, as we have seen, confined himself to small annoyances. One
authoritative word from him might probably have sufficed to put a stop to
the whole disgraceful business. (Kapp's "Soldatenhandel," pp. 147-177;
Kapp's "Friedrich der Grosse und die Vereinigten Staaten," part i. passim.
Frederick subsequently encouraged the French court to enter into the
American alliance, "Bancroft," vol. x. chap. iii. In January, 1778,
Schulenberg, Frederick's minister, wrote to Arthur Lee that the King of
Prussia would not delay to acknowledge the independence of the United
States so soon as France should have done so (Kapp, "Friedrich," etc., p.
52). This promise was not fulfilled.)
The march of the auxiliaries from their national headquarters to the sea
can have been, at least after the first year, no cheerful or martial
spectacle. The poor fellows travelled partially armed, escorted by picked
men. The villages in which they slept were surrounded by a double chain of
sentries (MSS. of Regiment von Mirbach, in the Cassel Library.) If they
went by the river Weser, a certain number of them had at most times, even
when Prussia was not unusually troublesome, to march round her territory
at Minden. We have seen how they were treated on the Rhine. For it was a
peculiarity of these troops, that a regiment of them could hardly pass
through any part of Germany where the authorities had not some claim on
some of the soldiers.
Seume, the captive poet, has left a graphic description of his experiences
on shipboard. The men were packed like herring. A tall man could not stand
upright between decks, nor sit up straight in his berth. To every such
berth six men were allotted, but as there was room for only four, the last
two had to squeeze in as best they might. "This was not cool in warm
weather," says Seume. Thus the men lay in what boys call "spoon fashion,"
and when they were tired on one side, the man on the right would call
"about face," and the whole file would turn over at once; then, when they
were tired again, the man on the left would give the same order, and they
would turn back on to the first side. The food was on a par with the
lodging. Pork and pease were the chief of their diet. The pork seemed to
be four or five years old. It was streaked with black towards the outside,
and was yellow farther in, with a little white in the middle. The salt
beef was in much the same condition. The ship biscuit was often full of
maggots. "We had to eat them for a relish," says Seume, "not to reduce our
slender rations too much." This biscuit was so hard that they sometimes
broke it up with a cannon-ball, and the story ran that it had been taken
from the French in the Seven Years' War, and lain in Portsmouth ever
since. The English had kept it twenty years or so, and "were now feeding
the Germans with it, that these might, if it were God's will, destroy
Rochambeau and Lafayette. It does not seem to have been God's will,
exactly." Sometimes they had groats and barley, or, by way of a treat, a
pudding made of flour mixed half with salt water and half with fresh
water, and with old, old mutton fat. The water was all spoiled. When a
cask was opened "it stank between decks like Styx, Phlegethon, and Cocytus
all together." It was thick with filaments as long as your finger, and
they had to filter it through a cloth before they could drink it. They
held their noses strong while they drank, and yet it was so scarce that
they fought to get it. Rum, and sometimes a little beer, completed their
fare.
Thus crowded together, with close air, bad food, and foul water, many of
them insufficiently clothed, these boys and old men, students,
shopkeepers, and peasants tossed for months on the Atlantic. Much of the
suffering of the voyage was doubtless inevitable, and many of the recruits
were already inured to hardship. But much of what they underwent was the
result of wanton carelessness or grasping avarice. What shall we say of
the British Quartermaster's Department, which sent these men to sea
without proper food or drink? What of the Duke of Brunswick, who
despatched his subjects to Canada without shoes and stockings that would
hold together, and without overcoats? Men have often borne such hardships
cheerfully for a cause that they understood and loved. But these poor
fellows suffered in a quarrel that was not their own, and simply to
provide means to pay the debts, or minister to the pleasures of their
masters. It is well for us to know something of their sufferings; to know
what despotism means.
CHAPTER VI.
THE BATTLE OF LONG ISLAND, AUGUST, 1776.
The first division of Hessians, some eight thousand strong, passed Sandy
Hook on August 15, 1776, and landed at Staten Island amid salvoes of
artillery and musketry. The division was under the command of Lieutenant-
general Philip von Heister, a tough old soldier of the Seven Years' War.
It is related that when Landgrave Frederick II called him to command the
Hessian expeditionary force, he did so in these terms: "Heister, you must
go along to America." "Very well, your Most Serene Highness, but I take
the liberty of making a few requests." "And what may they be?" "First, my
debts must be paid, my wife and children must be taken care of until I
come back, and if I should fall, my wife must have a pension." When the
Landgrave had smilingly assented, Heister cried out: "Now your Serene
Highness shall see what this old head and these bones can do."
The army collected on Staten Island under the command of Sir William Howe
numbered, after the arrival of the Hessians, between twenty-five and
thirty thousand soldiers. It was supported by a fleet under Sir William's
brother, Lord Howe. The opposing army of Washington was composed of some
thirteen or fourteen thousand men, not more than six thousand of whom had
any military experience, and whose officers were taken from civil life.
The Hessians were much struck with the appearance of wealth and plenty
which they found on Staten Island. The colonists lived in comfortable
houses surrounded by gardens and orchards. Their light red wagons drawn by
two small horses excited the wonder of the Germans. A colonist on Staten
Island lived as comfortably as a German country gentleman, and it seemed
extraordinary to the Hessians that people should revolt against a
government under which they enjoyed so many blessings. Many of the
Americans had fled from their homes on the approach of the Hessians, and
those who remained were at first inclined to be surly when troops were
quartered upon them; but when they saw that strict discipline was
enforced, and that only regular requisitions were made, the fugitives
returned, and relations of tolerance, if not of cordiality, were soon
established. The British government still hoped to reconcile the colonists
to the rule of the mother country, and strict orders had been given to
prevent all excesses.
No sooner did Sir William Howe find his army collected than he prepared to
attack the Americans. The British advance guard, under Sir Henry Clinton,
with the Hessian chasseurs and grenadiers, commanded by Colonel von Donop,
crossed the Narrows to Long Island on August 22, 1776. A diary, published
in a magazine at Frankfort-on-the- Main in the following year, gives a
graphic account of this operation and of those that followed:
"August 22. - We weighed anchor and lay close over against Long Island.
The ships of war came within range of the shore and pointed their cannon
at the beach. At eight in the morning the whole coast swarmed with boats.
At half-past eight the admiral hoisted the red flag, and in a moment all
the boats reached the shore. The English and Scotch, with the artillery,
were first disembarked, and then the brigade of Colonel von Donop (the
only Hessians there.) Not a soul opposed our landing. This was the second
blunder of the rebels since I have been in America. Their first mistake
was when we disembarked on Staten Island, for they might then have
destroyed a good many of our people with two six-pounders, and now they
might have made it very nasty for us. We marched on, equally undisturbed,
through Gravesend, and reached Flatbush towards evening. Three hundred
riflemen had been there a little while before us. We sent a few cannon
shots after them, set out our pickets, and slept quietly all night. I got
two horses as booty, one of which I sent to the colonel and gave the other
to my St. Martin for a pack-horse.
"August 23. - This morning early we were attacked on the right wing of the
advanced guard. We brought up a cannon and drove them back. It rained
bullets. Captain Congreve and one Constable were wounded by my side, and
an Englishman was shot through. In the afternoon they attacked on the left
side of the village and set fire to several houses, and we drew back into
the village. Lieutenant von Donop, who stood on the left wing, was wounded
in the breast; the ball glanced from his rib. I advanced on the right
wing, where I occupied a big garden, with one hundred and fifty men,
chasseurs and light infantry. As the enemy had fallen back from here, I
relieved Lieutenant von Donop. The rebels were placing cannon on the
highway, and our Scotch Highlanders had to make a battery across the road,
with embrasures for two cannon. I had to cover the work, and so came to
the advanced posts, where, however, I was little disturbed.
"August 24. - A hot day. The rebels approached twice, fired howitzers and
used grape and ball, so that all our artillery had to come up. At noon I
slept a little while, and was waked by two cannon-balls which covered me
with earth. The rebels have some very good marksmen, but some of them have
wretched guns, and most of them shoot crooked. But they are clever at
hunters' wiles. They climb trees, they crawl forward on their bellies for
one hundred and fifty paces, shoot, and go as quickly back again. They
make themselves shelters of boughs, etc. But to-day they are much put out
by our green coats (The chasseurs wore green coats with crimson
trimmings.), for we don't let our fellows fire unless they can get good
aim at a man, so that they dare not undertake anything more against us.
"August 25. - We barricaded ourselves in the village; and to-night our
chasseurs were to take a good rest. About two o'clock the rebels roused us
from our slumbers; we quickly quieted them, however, with two cannon and a
few rifle-shots. To-day we were attacked again, but after several of them
had bitten the dust they drew off. Long Island is a beautiful island, an
Arcadia; a most delightful region, full of meadows, corn-fields, all kinds
of fruit-trees and pleasantly built houses. There were still a great many
cattle there, although the rebels had taken many away with them. Most of
the inhabitants had fled from the houses (For a particular description of
this part of Long Island see " Schlozer's Briefwechsel," vol. ii. p. 103
et seq., by Lieutenant Hinrichs of the chasseurs.) The rebels advanced in
force. General Cornwallis wanted Colonel Donop to retire, but the colonel
stayed where he was and intrenched himself.
"August 26. - During this day we had much trouble, and at night were
continually awakened by alarms from the outposts. This was not caused by
attacks of the rebels, but mostly by deserters who wanted to come to us;
and when the English and the [Hessian] grenadiers heard them approach they
at once fired by platoons, if they did not get an immediate answer. To-day
General von Heister came over to us with six battalions (Of Hessians.
According to Bancroft these regiments crossed on the 25th. For an account
of the curious and complicated nomenclature of the Hessian regiments, and
of the different regiments engaged in different battles, see Appendix A.)
"August 27. - Our colonel had been promised that he should make the first
attack, and he heard that the English were to attack to-day, but he had
not received any orders either last evening or this morning. About ten
o'clock we were all put under arms (the colonel having then spoken with
General von Heister), and about eleven we were all in order of battle. On
our left and right the English advanced on the flanks, and destroyed those
that we drove back. On the left wing, where I commanded the advanced
guards (thirty chasseurs and twenty grenadiers), stood Colonel Block, with
his battalion. Behind me I had Captain Mallet with one company, as a
reserve. In the centre Captain von Wrede attacked, and had the battalion
von Minnigerode behind him. On the right Captain Lory pressed on,
supported by the three remaining companies of Linsig's battalion"
[Battalion von Linsingen].
In describing this arrangement of the troops, the writer refers only to
the brigade in which he served. The Hessians, forming the centre of the
British force, were posted on the Flatbush road. The right, under Clinton
and Lord Percy, with Sir William Howe, had started early in the morning
and succeeded in turning the left wing of the American position, near
Bedford, and in getting in its rear. On hearing the cannon on his right,
Heister ordered the Hessians to advance. The battle was substantially lost
and won before the first shot was fired, the Americans having been
outflanked. The latter saw themselves in danger of being cut off from
their fortifications, and fled. A few of them were drowned in Gowanus
Creek while trying to escape. Two whole regiments would probably have been
captured but for the bravery of General Stirling, who selected five
companies of Marylanders, with whom he covered the retreat of the rest. Of
these five companies only eight men escaped death or capture. We return to
our Hessian officer and his narrative.
"My chasseurs were so eager that I had hardly got into the wood when I
found myself alone with my command. I came into the middle of the rebel
camp, where they still were, saw on my left their great camp, on my right
a fortification, and fifty or sixty men were forming in column before me.
But we left them no time and beat them completely. Many were shot and
still more taken prisoners. I did not lose a single man, so much had the
rebels come to be afraid of the chasseurs. Things went equally well on the
other wing. We lost few men, and, except one chasseur, who was shot in the
village, not a single one was killed. On the other hand, we made on the
first day more than five hundred prisoners, among whom were General
Stirling and one other general, and Colonel Johnson was shot. General
Stirling is one of the most important rebels, who, sword in hand, forced
the people to fight against their king. As long as we had no horses, the
prisoners were harnessed in front of the cannon, and they were afterwards
sent aboard the ships of war. In two days we had taken eleven hundred men.
The rebels looked ragged, and had no shirts on. Our Hessians marched like
Hessians; they marched incorrigibly, and the English like the bravest and
best of soldiers. They, therefore, lost more men than we. This was a lucky
day for us. The rebels had a very advantageous position in the wood, and
we had a very bad one in the village of Flatbush. At first they made good
use of their position, burned down a house and set fire to the barns upon
our outposts. But when we attacked them courageously in their hiding-
places, they ran, as all mobs do." ("Die Neuesten Staatsbegebenheiten,"
1777, Frankfurt a. M., pp. 110-116. The letter, of which the above is the
largest part, would seem to have been written by an officer of chasseurs,
probably either Major von Prueschenk or Lieutenant von Grothausen.)
The editor of the Frankfort magazine, who publishes the above, remarks
that many letters from Hessian officers have appeared in the newspapers;
that these officers ascribe a great part of the credit of the victory to
themselves, and that, in view of the well known valor of the Hessian
soldiery, they undoubtedly deserve it, but that some of them make too
little of the resistance and military knowledge of the Americans, "so that
the honor of having gained a victory over an enemy numbering only one
third as many as themselves almost suffers." The remark is certainly
pertinent, and the odds do not appear to be overstated. Washington's army
before the battle was occupying lines which extended from Kingsbridge to
Flatbush. There were probably not more than eight thousand Americans on
Long Island, while those actually engaged on the advanced lines numbered
only four or five thousand, against twenty thousand Englishmen and Germans.
THE BATTLE OF LONG ISLAND
Sir William Howe, in his official report, sets the American loss in
killed, wounded, prisoners and drowned, at three thousand three hundred
men; but Bancroft believes this to be a gross exaggeration, and, relying
on Washington's report and a careful inquiry, says that the total American
loss did not exceed one thousand, of whom three quarters were taken
prisoners. The English loss, according to Howe, was seventeen officers and
three hundred and one non-commissioned officers and privates; the Hessians
had two men killed, and two officers and twenty-three privates wounded.
"The enemy," writes Colonel von Heeringen, commanding a Hessian regiment,
"had almost impenetrable thickets, lines, abattis, and redoubts in front
of them. The riflemen were mostly spitted to the trees with bayonets.
These frightful people deserve pity rather than fear. It always takes them
a quarter of an hour to load, and meanwhile they feel our balls and
bayonets." Among the prisoners taken by the Hessians were two generals -
Sullivan and Stirling. Nothing can be more characteristic of the hatred
and contempt felt at this time by the Hessian officers for the
undisciplined troop of rebels to whom they were opposed, than Von
Heeringen's account of these generals and of other officers of the
American army. "John Sullivan was a lawyer, and previously a domestic
servant, but a man of genius, whom the rebels will much regret. Among the
prisoners are many so-called colonels, lieutenant-colonels, majors, and
other officers, who, however, are nothing but mechanics, tailors,
shoemakers, wig-makers, barbers, etc. Some of them were soundly beaten by
our people, who would by no means let such persons pass for officers.
Sullivan was brought to me. I had him searched and found the original
orders of General Washington on him; from which it appears that he had the
best troops under his command, that everything depended on his holding the
wood, and that he was eight thousand men strong. The English have one
hundred and fifty killed and wounded" [three hundred and eighteen, says
Sir William Howe]. "This they owe more to their disorderly attack than to
the valor of the enemy. It looked horrible in the wood, as at least two
thousand killed and wounded lay there. Colonel John, of the rebels, is
dead. A grenadier took him prisoner and generously gave him his life, only
telling him to go back to the battalion which was following, for the
grenadier was a skirmisher. The colonel wanted to murder him, slyly, from
behind; secretly drew out a pistol, but only hit the grenadier in the arm,
whereupon the latter treated him to three or four bayonet strokes."
"Among the officers taken I did not find a single one who had been in
foreign service. They are nothing but rebels and citizens settled here.
Tailor Graul would play a considerable part here." Colonel von Heeringen
clearly considers it far more honorable to fight in other people's
quarrels than in one's own. A man who had once been a mercenary could be
more readily forgiven for being a rebel. "My Lord Stirling himself is only
an echappe de famille, and does not pass for a lord in England. He looks
as much like my Lord Granby as one egg does like another. General Putnam
is a butcher by profession. I imagine him to be like Butcher Fischer at
Rinteln. The rebels desert in great numbers, and it is nothing to see
colonels, lieutenant-colonels, and majors come in with whole troops of
men. The captured flag, which is made of red damask, with the motto,
'Liberty,' appeared with sixty men before Rall's regiment. They had all
shouldered their guns upside down, and had their hats under their arms.
They fell on their knees and begged piteously for their lives. No regiment
is properly uniformed or armed. Every man has a common gun, such as the
citizens in Hesse march out with at Whitsuntide. Stirling's regiment,
however, was uniformed in blue and red, three battalions strong, and
mostly composed of Germans recruited in Pennsylvania. They were tall, fine-
looking fellows, and had extremely good English guns, with bayonets. This
regiment met the English, and as the latter took them for Hessians in the
bushes, they did not fire; but their error cost them Colonel Grant,
several other officers, and eighty men. A volley was fired. The English
gathered themselves together, attacked with the bayonet, knocked everybody
head over heels, and those they did not massacre they took prisoners. In
short, the whole regiment is ruined. The rebel artillery is miserable,
mostly of iron, and mounted on ships' carriages."(Quoted in Eelking's
"Hulfstruppen," vol. i. p. 37 n., from the Preussisches Militair-
Wochenblatt, 1833, Nrs. 863, 864.)
It is said that many times in this battle the English and Hessians did not
give quarter when it was asked. Colonel von Heeringen says: "The English
did not give much quarter, and constantly urged our people to do the
like." The Americans are said also to have believed that the Hessians gave
no quarter, and to have fought with peculiar desperation, after hope was
lost, in consequence. The fact that neither side could understand the
other may have tended to diminish the chance of surrender, and have
contributed to swell the complaints that some of the Americans had
treacherously attacked their captors after yielding. "They were," says
Lieutenant Ruffer in his diary (Quoted in Eelking's "Hulfstruppen," vol.
i. p. 45), "so timid that they preferred to be shot rather than to take
quarter, because their generals and officers had told them that they would
be hanged." Surely the most curious proof of cowardice ever alleged
against any soldiers whatsoever.
After the loss of so important a position, and of so many men in
proportion to the numbers of his little army, Washington thought it
inexpedient to try to hold the works at Brooklyn, and seeing that the
English fleet was preparing to occupy the East River and cut off his
retreat, he abandoned Long Island on the night of August 29th-30th, and
crossed over to New York, bringing off all his stores and cannon, except a
few heavy pieces which stuck in the mud. A myth was current among the
Hessians, to the effect that an order of Washington had been found in the
deserted camp, stating that, whereas it was impossible to resist such
cruel and terrible enemies as the Hessians, one must make the best of
one's way off. Thus had the German troops seen their first battle in the
New World. It had added to the contempt they had already felt for a
rebellious and undisciplined enemy, a contempt which it was to take long
years of war and of disaster wholly to eradicate (For the Battle of Long
Island, see the authorities above quoted and the MS. journals of the
Grenadier Battalion von Minnigerode, the Regiment von Lossberg (Heusser),
and the same regiment (Piel). For the Evacuation of Long Island, see
"Washington's Writings" (Sparks's ed.), vol. iv. p. 69.)
CHAPTER VII.
FROM THE OCCUPATION OF NEW YORK TO THE TAKING OF FORT WASHINGTON,
SEPTEMBER 15TH TO NOVEMBER 16TH, 1776.
There is not much to remind the present inhabitant of New York of the
little city that lay at the south end of Manhattan Island a hundred years
ago. It was a pretty place, with large, comfortable houses, built mostly
of yellow brick. Within were low-studded rooms, with sanded floors, and
high, painted wainscots. The sideboards, of solid mahogany, in the better
houses, shone with pewter for every-day use; and there was often solid
silver, for state occasions. The streets were crooked and had gutters in
the middle, but were fairly clean, and bordered with trees. Before the war
there had been over twenty thousand inhabitants, but many of these had
fled on the approach of the contending armies. There were many Tories,
especially among the rich.
At the time when Washington retreated from Brooklyn, New York was defended
by a permanent fort, called Fort George, at the west end of the Battery,
and by temporary works thrown up at various places along the shore. On the
north, or landward, side, a barrier crossed Broadway near the Bowling
Green, and there was another near the site of the present Centre Market.
Beyond the fortifications lay the country, "the most beautiful)" says a
Hessian officer, "that I have ever seen." (Lieutenant Hinrichs, in
Schlozer's "Briefwechsel," vol. ii. p. 108.) Corn-fields, meadows and
orchards covered the charming land, and from the hill-tops the old
colonial houses, each surrounded by its piazza and crowned with its
balustrade, looked down on the smiling landscape. The Hessian lieutenant,
in his enthusiasm, calls them palaces; and truly, there was a dignity in
the best domestic architecture of the time that makes that name hardly
inappropriate.
In spite of the anxiety of Washington and of Congress to keep possession
of New York, the town was clearly indefensible. The British had complete
command of the harbor, and a greatly superior force on land. Consequently,
when, on the 15th of September, 1776, the royal troops landed on the
island, the only care of Washington, who had for several days been
removing guns and stores, was to bring off the rear-guard of his army
before its retreat should be prevented by the British. The landing was
effected under protection of English ships of war at a place called Kip's
Bay, near East Thirty-fourth Street. My Hessian lieutenant calls it four
miles from New York, but he overstates the distance. The Hessians, with
the advance guard, were, as usual, the chasseurs and grenadiers under Von
Donop. These marched immediately on New York, while the English light
infantry and Highlanders hastened to occupy the Incleberg, now known as
Murray Hill. The Americans, meanwhile, under old Israel Putnam, were
making the best of their way up the roads nearest the North River, towards
Bloomingdale.
No opposition was made to the landing of the British. The New England
militia, who should have delayed that operation, behaved very badly,
drawing on themselves the violent indignation of Washington. It is said
that a part of the American army would undoubtedly have been cut off in
consequence of this panic, had not Mrs. Murray detained Sir William Howe
by her hospitable reception, and the attractions of her old Madeira. The
worthy lady kept the British general in good humor for two hours, while
her ragged and hungry countrymen escaped from his grasp. Never have the
hospitalities of Murray Hill answered a better purpose.
On the 16th of September a smart skirmish took place in the neighborhood
of Manhattanville. Some British light infantry and two battalions of
Highlanders wore driven back, and were in a somewhat precarious position,
when the omnipresent chasseurs and grenadiers advanced to their
assistance, and some other German regiments were also put in motion.
Washington, fearing that the enemy were sending a large body to support
their party, as was indeed the case, ordered a retreat. Of the English,
two hundred and eighty were killed and wounded; of the Americans, about
sixty. This action, in which the latter behaved very well, and inflicted a
comparatively heavy loss on the British, did much to bring back their
confidence after the reverses and retreats of the preceeding days.
The British general had given strict orders to respect personal property,
and presently the rich owners of country-houses, who had fled at the
approach of the royal forces, leaving their possessions in charge of their
servants, began to return. Lieutenant Hinrichs, of the Hessian chasseurs,
who had received orders on the 15th of September to prevent depredations,
had earned thereby the gratitude of the inhabitants. He was wounded in the
skirmish of the 16th, and forced to look for quiet and good nursing. He
took shelter with a widow named Oglyby (Ogilvie?) near Hornhook, on the
East River, and had the satisfaction of seeing her whole family meet again
after the separation caused by the perils of war. Grandfather, mother, and
grand-children, together with the black slaves and their children, met and
embraced with so much affection that our good-natured lieutenant was much
moved, and passed a feverish night. It is needless to say that his hosts
treated him with the greatest kindness. He recovered from his wound, and
from others which he afterwards received in the course of the Revolution,
and died a Prussian lieutenant-general in 1834.
The city of New York had been but five days in the hands of the British
when, on the night of the 20th to the 21st of September, a fire broke out
in a low drinking-house near Whitehall Slip. The weather had been dry and
hot. A gale was blowing from the southwest. The fire spread with frightful
rapidity. The east side of Broadway was burned as far up as Exchange
Place. Then, the wind having veered to the southeast, the fire crossed
Broadway above Morris Street, and extended to Barclay Street, burning old
Trinity Church, but sparing St. Paul's. The fire was at last mastered,
mainly by the exertions of soldiers and sailors. Bancroft is positive that
this fire was not the work of incendiaries. Such, however, was not the
idea of the British and Hessians at the time, and some modern historians
believe their accounts. Sir William Howe states in his report that fire
was set in various places. Donop is said by Eelking to have written in his
diary that the conflagration was arranged by an American colonel named
Scott, who had previously been a lawyer. This man had employed forty
desperate fellows. who were provided with all sorts of combustibles, and
who set fire to various houses belonging to Tories. According to this
story, Scott was arrested, and the whole plan in writing was found upon
him. In support of the opinion of those who believe that the fire was set
by the Whigs, is the undoubted fact that several leading Americans had
advised burning New York, and that the plan had even been proposed by
Washington to Congress (Washington, vol. iv. p. 74.), which rejected it.
On the other hand, panic and fury, stories of incendiarism, and acts of
violence are almost invariable accompaniments of a great conflagration.
Statements made at such a time should always be taken with the greatest
caution. The story concerning Scott is, I believe, entirely unconfirmed.
It is certain that sundry persons were killed by English soldiers during
the progress of the fire, and Bancroft says that one poor man, who
happened to be a Tory, was hanged by the heels until he died.
On the 10th of October, 1776, General Howe embarked the greater part of
his troops with the intention of again trying to cut Washington's line of
retreat and shut him up in Manhattan Island. For four days the British
were detained in the East River by an adverse wind, and only passed Hell
Gate on the afternoon of the 14th. The fleet lay at anchor that night and
started at six the next morning, but was detained by winds and tides, and
did not reach Throg's Neck (or Frog's Point, as Washington calls it),
until nightfall. Here Howe had previously landed his advance guard, but
Washington had been beforehand with him, and had occupied the passes
leading to the mainland. Howe consequently determined to push on and
effect a landing at East Chester. This he succeeded in doing on the 18th
of October, after a sharp skirmish. The British army lay on its arms that
night, with its left wing protected by a creek near East Chester, and its
right near New Rochelle. The Americans, meanwhile, were making the best of
their way to White Plains, where they took up a strong position and
intrenched it. just at this juncture the Second Division of Hessians
joined the rest of the army. It consisted of three thousand nine hundred
and ninety-seven men, commanded by Lieutenant-General Wilhelm von
Knyphausen, and had left Cassel early in May. The Waldeck regiment, six
hundred and seventy strong, came with this division, as also the second
company of chasseurs, under Captain Ewald. Thus the German corps under the
command of General von Heister was brought up to about thirteen thousand
four hundred men. The new division was left to hold New Rochelle during
the British advance on White Plains.
Captain Ewald and his second company of chasseurs had not long to wait
before coming into action. On the 23d of October, while attempting a
reconnaissance, they were met by a superior force of riflemen, and would
have been driven back had not the Highlanders come to their assistance.
One lieutenant and six men were wounded, of whom four afterwards died of
their wounds. This is the German account in Eelking's book. I will now
give that of General Washington's aide-de-camp in his report to the
President of Congress: "On Wednesday there was also a smart skirmish
between a party of Colonel Hand's riflemen, about two hundred and forty,
and nearly the same number of Hessian chasseurs, in which the latter were
put to rout. Our men buried ten of them on the field, and took two
prisoners, one badly wounded. We sustained no other loss than having one
lad wounded, supposed mortally." (Washington, vol. iv. p. 524. The MS.
journal of the Grenadier Battalion von Minnigerode gives Ewald's loss at
four killed, three wounded, and two missing. I have not found any mention
of this skirmish in Ewald's "Belehrungen.") This is about as near as such
reports usually come to each other.
On the 28th of October, Sir William Howe found Washington's army
advantageously posted behind the village of White Plains. It numbered
somewhat more than thirteen thousand men, of whom about fifteen hundred
occupied Chatterton Hill, on the extreme right of the American position,
and were separated from the main body by the river Bronx. Sir William
determined to attack this right wing. One English and two Hessian
regiments, supported by the Hessian grenadiers, forded the Bronx and
scaled the steep and rocky sides of the hill. The regiment Von Lossberg
was obliged to charge through a burning wood, and to face the heaviest
American fire. Its loss in killed and wounded was not far from fifty men.
The result of the contest might have been doubtful, had not Colonel Rall,
commanding his own regiment and that named after Knyphausen, also forded
the Bronx, outflanked the Americans, and assisted the troops which were
making the attack in front. The river was deep, and the Hessian soldiers
hesitated to enter it. Lieutenants Wiederhold and Briede dashed in first
to set them an example. We shall hear more of the former of these officers
(See Wiederhold's MS diary. Unless Ewald is mistaken, Wiederhold, although
still a lieutenant, cannot have been very young at this time. He had
already distinguished himself in 1762. - Ewald's "Belehrungen," vol. iii.
p. 130.) The second fell a few days later at the taking of Fort Washington.
Some of the Americans fought fairly well on this occasion, against much
superior numbers. They had an undoubted advantage of position, and made
good use of it, inflicting a loss of about two hundred and eighty killed
and wounded on their enemy. Howe mentions in his despatches the good
service done by the English and Hessian artillery. Heister's adjutant-
general says that the Hessian field- pieces made such a "thunder-storm"
that one could neither see nor hear. The Americans had but three small
cannon on the hill (For the action at White Plains: Bancroft, vol. ix. pp.
181-183; Eelking's "Hulfstruppen," vol. i. pp. 71-77; Washington, vol. iv.
pp. 526-529; MS journal of the Grenadier Battalion von Minnigerode; of the
Regiment von Lossberg (Heuser); Wiederhold's Diary.)
The American army at this time was largely composed of militiamen, sent by
the various states for short periods of service. These militiamen were in
great measure ill-armed and in rags, undisciplined, and commanded by
officers who had but a few months before left the desk or the plough.
While some of these improvised officers were persons of character and
talent, others possessed no merit but their ability to raise men. The men
thus raised would consider and treat such an officer as an equal, "and, in
the character of an officer," says Washington, "regard him no more than a
broomstick." (Washington, vol. iv. p. 113.) Some of the Americans had
distinguished themselves by deeds of valor, but, like all raw recruits,
they were subject to panics, often entirely unreasonable. These facts must
constantly be borne in mind, or the story of the Revolution becomes
incomprehensible. Sir William Howe, on the other hand, commanded a
regular, disciplined soldiery, scarcely to be surpassed in Europe, and
provided with everything desirable for the conduct of a war.
For three days after the engagement at Chatterton Hill the armies stood
facing each other and strengthened their fortifications. On the night of
the 31st of October, Washington retreated to a strong position above White
Plains, and Howe on the morrow, after harassing the American rear guard,
turned his attention to a new scheme.
On the highest point of New York Island, where a hill rises two hundred
and thirty-eight feet above the level of the Hudson, the Americans had
built a fivesided earthwork and called it Fort Washington. The fort
mounted thirty- four cannon, but without casemates. The ground about it
was well suited for defense, and was occupied by smaller works of no great
strength. The whole formed a barrier across the upper end of Manhattan
Island, preventing the English from making any expedition by land, and
rendering winter quarters in New York neither safe nor comfortable.
On the Jersey side of the Hudson, on top of the Palisades, opposite Fort
Washington, stood Fort Lee. Between them, Putnam had undertaken to build
an impassable barrier, that should close the river against the British.
The works were under the immediate command of General Greene. On the
morning of October 9th, however, the obstructions had been broken through
and the forts passed by two British ships of forty-four guns each, a
frigate of twenty guns, and three or four tenders, which had captured or
destroyed two American row-galleys on the river (Bancroft, vol. ix. p.
174; Washington, vol. iv. p. 148.) In view of these facts, Washington
wished to abandon the fort named after himself, which was in danger of
being surrounded. Greene was of the opposite opinion, and Congress shared
the delusion of Greene. The authority of the commander-in-chief was so
limited that he did not succeed in making his own views prevail. Instead
of being withdrawn, the garrison of Fort Washington was strengthened,
until Lieutenant-colonel Magaw, who commanded it, had nearly three
thousand men under his orders. The ground to be occupied was two miles and
a half long - from a line a little south of the present Trinity Cemetery
to the hills above Tubby Hook - and included a redoubt on Laurel Hill
(Bancroft, vol. ix. p. 189.)
It was on the 16th of November, 1776, that this fort was stormed by Sir
William Howe's army. The attack was made simultaneously by four columns,
advancing against four different points, but that which bore the brunt of
the fighting, and to which the glory of the day belonged, was composed of
Hessians under Knyphausen. This force crossed over to New York island by
Kings Bridge at half-past five in the morning, and was divided into two
columns, the right-hand one under Colonel Rall, the left under Major-
general Schmidt. In this column Wiederhold was with the advance guard. For
a long time the Germans had to stand quiet, while the English columns got
into position and began the attack. Meanwhile Cornwallis had taken the
American battery on Laurel Hill. Earl Percy, with two English and one
Hessian brigade, had threatened the American works on the south, and
Colonel Sterling, with the Highlanders, had crossed Harlem River behind
the force opposed to Percy, and threatened to cut off its retreat. In
doing this the Highlanders had to charge up a steep bank, and lost about
ninety men. Colonel Cadwalader, who commanded the Americans in this
neighborhood, had been obliged to retreat, and his men, instead of
rallying outside of Fort Washington itself, had rushed into the narrow
enclosure, impeding the defensive operations of its proper garrison.
It was between ten and eleven o'clock. The moment for the Hessians to
attack had come at last. They waded through a marsh, and climbed the
precipitous, rocky hill on which the fort was built. In vain did the
riflemen shoot them down. In vain did the artillery rain grape and ball
among them. Knyphausen, himself, was continually in the thickest of the
fight, "so that it is wonderful," writes Wiederhold, "that he came off
without being killed or wounded." The ground was so steep in places that
the men had to pull themselves up by the bushes. At last they reached the
top, where there was a level space. "Forward, all my grenadiers!" cried
Rall. The drums beat, the bugles blew, the men shouted Hurrah! Hessians
and Americans were mingled in a mass, all rushing wildly towards the fort.
The outer works were taken, and their defenders driven back to add to the
confusion in the main fort. Colonel Rall called one of his captains.
"Hohenstein," said he, "you speak English and French; take a drummer with
you, tie a white cloth on a gun-barrel, go to the fort and call for a
surrender." "I did this at once," writes the captain, "but they kept
firing at me and the drummer until we came to the glacis, where the rebels
led us off with our eyes bound. They sent me a Colonel (Cadwalader.), who
was second in command, to whom I made the following proposal: He should
immediately march out of the fort with the garrison, and they should lay
down their arms before General von Knyphausen. All ammunition, provisions,
and whatever belonged to Congress should be faithfully made known. On the
other hand, I gave him my word that all, from the commanding officer down,
should retain their private property. Finally, a white flag should be
immediately hoisted, to put a stop to all hostilities. The commander asked
for four hours time to consider, which, however, I refused, and allowed
him only half an hour to speak with his officers. When the half-hour was
past the commander came himself, and his fate seemed hard to him.
Thereupon he said: 'The Hessians make impossibilities possible.' I then
said to him: 'General von Knyphausen is a hundred paces off. Come with me,
on my safe conduct, and see if he will give you better terms.' He was
contented with this and went with me."
To Knyphausen Magaw surrendered, in spite of a message from Washington,
promising to attempt to bring off the troops, if he could hold out until
night. The place, however, was untenable. The Germans lost fifty-six
officers and men killed and two hundred and seventy-six wounded (MS
journal of the Regiment von Lossberg (Heuser).) in the attack, the English
more than one hundred and twenty. The Americans lost less than one hundred
and fifty killed and wounded, but about twenty-eight hundred prisoners,
among whom were some of their best soldiers. They also lost a good deal of
artillery and many arms and accoutrements.
The quartermaster of the Grenadier Battalion von Minnigerode says, in
speaking of this battle, that if it had not been for the prisoners, the
loss of the Germans would have been far greater than that of the rebels,
and that this is because of the manner in which the latter fight. They lie
singly behind trees, bushes, stone walls, and rocks, shoot at long range
and with certainty, and run away very fast as soon as they have fired. The
Germans cannot shoot a third so far, and can still less catch them
running, and the ground here is such that field artillery can seldom be
brought up to an attack.
The Hessians are said to have given no quarter, during the charge, to the
riflemen whom they found in the outworks and the woods. The Americans,
many of whom must have seen this, were naturally uneasy at the time of the
surrender. The popular imagination had made fiends of the Hessians.
Captain von Malsburg relates that when he came into the fortress he found
himself surrounded by officers with fear and anxiety in their faces. They
invited him into their barracks, pressed punch, wine, and cold cakes upon
him, complimented him on his affability, which seemed to astonish them,
and told him they had not been led to expect such from a Hessian officer.
They begged for his protection, and he, in return, lectured them on the
sin of rebellion against their good king.
The garrison marched out between the regiments Rall and Lossberg, laid
down their arms, and gave up their banners, which were yellow, white, and
light blue. Knyphausen is said to have looked on these "with disdain." The
attitude is characteristic of the Hessian feeling of the moment, and the
American reader must find consolation in the fact that within six weeks
the colors of the regiments Rall and Lossberg were in the hands of
Washington's army.
The Hessians gained great credit by this action. Schmidt, Stirn, and Rall,
and the troops under their command, were mentioned in general orders, and
the captured fort was named Fort Knyphausen. No disgrace can attach to the
Americans in the fort, who made a creditable resistance against great
odds. The blame lies with those generals who insisted on holding the fort
after the abandonment of the island by the main army under Washington, and
after the obstructions in the Hudson had been passed by the British ships
(For the taking of Fort Washington, see Washington's report; Washington,
vol. iv. pp. 178-181; also, Bancroft, vol. ix. pp. 189-193; Eelking's
"Hulfstruppen," vol. i. pp. 84-97; MSS Wiederhold's Diary, Journals of the
Grenadier Battalion von Minnigerode, of the Regiment von Lossberg
(Heuser), of the same (Piel), of the Regiments von Huyn and von Knoblauch.)
Hessians in the Rev. War - End of Chapters V-VII
Search All Library Items
How to Donate Books & Money
WebRoots Home Page ~
Library Main Page ~
Catalog Main Page
List of Newest & All Library Items ~
Contact WebRoots
Contents of this Website (c) WebRoots, Inc.
A Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation